Ist Sozialismus eine Weltanschauung?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
After Gregory Baum [[Secondary_Literature_about_Karl_Polanyi#Baum1996|1996, 24-29]], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“. | After Gregory Baum [[Secondary_Literature_about_Karl_Polanyi#Baum1996|1996, 24-29]], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“. | ||
I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that : | I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that : | ||
[[File:AKP 02-16, 41.png| | [[File:AKP 02-16, 41.png|600px|thumb|right]] | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == | ||
Revision as of 05:19, 23 April 2017
Why not „Über die Freiheit“?
After Gregory Baum 1996, 24-29, Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“. I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that :
Reference
Reference:
AKP: 02/16 + 03/03
Publications:
| Lg | Publication |
|---|---|
| EN | |
| DE | „Über di Freiheit“ in POLANYI 2005, p. 137-170 |
| FR |