Ist Sozialismus eine Weltanschauung?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that : [[File:AKP 02-16, 41.png|800px|thumb|right]] | I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that : [[File:AKP 02-16, 41.png|800px|thumb|right]] | ||
In the last line, we can read after the correction, "Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?”. | In the last line, we can read after the correction, "Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?”. | ||
In the archive 02/16, we see that Polanyi tried to change a speech [ | In the archive 02/16, we see that Polanyi tried to change a speech [1-39] in a text [41-96]. In the archive 03/03, he follows this work with a table of contents and some fragments of the same text. | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == |
Revision as of 05:23, 23 April 2017
Why not „Über die Freiheit“?
After Gregory Baum 1996, 24-29, Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“.
I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that :
In the last line, we can read after the correction, "Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?”. In the archive 02/16, we see that Polanyi tried to change a speech [1-39] in a text [41-96]. In the archive 03/03, he follows this work with a table of contents and some fragments of the same text.
Reference
Reference:
AKP: 02/16 + 03/03
Publications:
Lg | Publication |
---|---|
EN | |
DE | „Über di Freiheit“ in POLANYI 2005, p. 137-170 |
FR |