Believing and Unbelieving Politics: Difference between revisions

From Karl Polanyi
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " == Text Informations == '''Reference''':<br /> '''First Publication''': “Hivö és hitetlen politika”, ''Napkelet'', 2.7, p. 984-990<br /> '''AKP''': 01/40 (7 typed p...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Page |n°=99}} … Marx … {{Page |n°=100}} … Bertrand Russell …  {{Page |n°=101}} … Hegel's conception of State … {{Page |n°=102}} … Henry George … {{Page |n°=103}}
{{Page |n°=104}} We should not dwell on the essence of human nature. For our part, we refuse to discuss the topic. The question is too obscure and vague to be able to support the sort of important conclusions that are under discussion here. The future of humanity, its universal faith, cannot reasonably be left in the hands of a seemingly well-founded economic theory or law of physics, let alone commonsensical philosophical truisms.
[…]
{{Page |n°=105}}  {{Page |n°=106}}


== Text Informations ==
== Text Informations ==
'''Reference''':<br />
'''Reference''':<br />
'''First Publication''': “[[Hivö és hitetlen politika]]”, ''Napkelet'', 2.7, p. 984-990<br />
'''First Publication''': “[[Hivö és hitetlen politika]]”, ''Napkelet'', 2.7, p. 984-990<br />
'''AKP''': 01/40 (7 typed p. in Hungarian)<br />
'''KPA''': [[01/40]] (7 typed p. in Hungarian)<br />
'''Recent Publication in English''': “Believing and Unbelieving Politics”, in [[POLANYI 2016]], p. 99-107<br />
'''Recent Publication in English''': “Believing and Unbelieving Politics”, in [[POLANYI 2016]], p. 99-107<br />
'''Other Languages''':<br />
'''Other Languages''':<br />

Latest revision as of 00:24, 8 September 2019

[99] … Marx … [100] … Bertrand Russell … [101] … Hegel's conception of State … [102] … Henry George … [103]

[104] We should not dwell on the essence of human nature. For our part, we refuse to discuss the topic. The question is too obscure and vague to be able to support the sort of important conclusions that are under discussion here. The future of humanity, its universal faith, cannot reasonably be left in the hands of a seemingly well-founded economic theory or law of physics, let alone commonsensical philosophical truisms.

[…]

[105] [106]

Text Informations

Reference:
First Publication: “Hivö és hitetlen politika”, Napkelet, 2.7, p. 984-990
KPA: 01/40 (7 typed p. in Hungarian)
Recent Publication in English: “Believing and Unbelieving Politics”, in POLANYI 2016, p. 99-107
Other Languages:

Lg Name
DE
FR Politique de croyants et de non-croyants