To Ilona (24 September 1947): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class=hand-written"> | |||
{{Page |n°=260}} Darling sister, | |||
Two events happened today in my life of work: a student who had made ___ of my sociological draft and is leaving for Palestine to write her thesis on communist agricultural settlements, unexpectedly sent me a brief paper with a complete elaboration of the application of my ____ + definitions to her future field! They ___ is not a student of mine had {hanty} {rpohen} to her; she had p___ made notes of my draft whing I refused to leave with her. | |||
I regard this as the <u>experimentum crucis</u>. It proves fully the relevance of the new approach. | |||
In the afternoon I discovered a paper written in 1924, and presented to the Prussian Academy, which completely bears out my theory on primitive feudalism & "feudalism of {deoy}" which I intend to make my chief ___ of study. | |||
{{Page |n°=261}} The man had broken into the sanctum, but ____ I have the key. I possess the key, but was not certain what I would find in the sanctum. Actually I now know what my _______ was correct. But of course my explanation is much simplest and its inexplications are highly relevant to our time. | |||
This was a wonderful day. | |||
[…] | |||
</div> | |||
== Letter Informations == | == Letter Informations == | ||
'''Reference''':<br /> | '''Reference''':<br /> | ||
'''KPA''': [[59/08]], 260-261 | '''KPA''': [[59/08]], 260-261 | ||
Revision as of 07:16, 16 January 2018
[260] Darling sister,
Two events happened today in my life of work: a student who had made ___ of my sociological draft and is leaving for Palestine to write her thesis on communist agricultural settlements, unexpectedly sent me a brief paper with a complete elaboration of the application of my ____ + definitions to her future field! They ___ is not a student of mine had {hanty} {rpohen} to her; she had p___ made notes of my draft whing I refused to leave with her.
I regard this as the experimentum crucis. It proves fully the relevance of the new approach.
In the afternoon I discovered a paper written in 1924, and presented to the Prussian Academy, which completely bears out my theory on primitive feudalism & "feudalism of {deoy}" which I intend to make my chief ___ of study.
[261] The man had broken into the sanctum, but ____ I have the key. I possess the key, but was not certain what I would find in the sanctum. Actually I now know what my _______ was correct. But of course my explanation is much simplest and its inexplications are highly relevant to our time.
This was a wonderful day.
[…]
Letter Informations
Reference:
KPA: 59/08, 260-261