Talk:Letter to Michael (1944): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Santiago Pinault moved page Talk:Letter to Michael, Without Date (1) to Talk:Letter to Michael (1944)) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | |||
[[57/08]], 44-47; the Box contains letters of 1958, but at the end there are 4 letters without date. This one comes from Michael Polanyi Papers. | == Questions == | ||
=== Why 1944? === | |||
[[57/08]], 44-47; the Box contains letters of 1958, but at the end there are 4 letters without date. This one , also present in KPA, comes from Michael Polanyi Papers. | |||
Elements helping the datation: | Elements helping the datation: | ||
* the direction | * the direction: it's the same than those in [[To Taylor (17 August 1944)|a letter to Taylor x]] in 1944 | ||
* | * 1944: he speaks about the “The Karoly movement” and Karl Mannheim => we have to see when Mannheim enters its, but Polanyi enters in 1944. | ||
* In | * In 1944, Kari is 21 years old and seeks a job; she is not already married. | ||
* He saw Kenneth Muir recently in Leeds, so he is in England | |||
* In 1944, he also wrote to a “master” (see below) | |||
=== “your paper” === | |||
* Which one could be? --[[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]) 00:45, 21 September 2017 (BST) | |||
=== “the book” === | |||
* “The proofs of the book have arrived”, ”Macmillans“: which book can P. speaks about? | |||
=== A Master === | |||
* “Do you not think that I should see the Master about it?”: who can be this “Master”? A.D. Lindsay, the master of Bailliol [See [[Dale 2016]], 122]? Was he “very closely connected with Nuffield College”? Is it the same “master” that Polanyi wrote the [[To 'Master' (15 July 1944)|July 15th, 1944]]? --[[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]) 00:45, 21 September 2017 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:46, 21 September 2017
Questions
Why 1944?
57/08, 44-47; the Box contains letters of 1958, but at the end there are 4 letters without date. This one , also present in KPA, comes from Michael Polanyi Papers.
Elements helping the datation:
- the direction: it's the same than those in a letter to Taylor x in 1944
- 1944: he speaks about the “The Karoly movement” and Karl Mannheim => we have to see when Mannheim enters its, but Polanyi enters in 1944.
- In 1944, Kari is 21 years old and seeks a job; she is not already married.
- He saw Kenneth Muir recently in Leeds, so he is in England
- In 1944, he also wrote to a “master” (see below)
“your paper”
- Which one could be? --Santiago Pinault (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2017 (BST)
“the book”
- “The proofs of the book have arrived”, ”Macmillans“: which book can P. speaks about?
A Master
- “Do you not think that I should see the Master about it?”: who can be this “Master”? A.D. Lindsay, the master of Bailliol [See Dale 2016, 122]? Was he “very closely connected with Nuffield College”? Is it the same “master” that Polanyi wrote the July 15th, 1944? --Santiago Pinault (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2017 (BST)