Talk:Ist Sozialismus eine Weltanschauung?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Why not „Über die Freiheit“? == After Gregory Baum <nowiki>[</nowiki>1996, 24-29], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thom...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Collaborative Work == | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! Task | |||
! Name | |||
! Date | |||
|- | |||
| Typing | |||
| Santiago Pinault | |||
| 2016 | |||
|- | |||
| Proofreading | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
== Why not „Über die Freiheit“? == | == Why not „Über die Freiheit“? == | ||
After Gregory Baum <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Secondary_Literature_about_Karl_Polanyi#Baum1996|1996, 24-29]]], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“. | After Gregory Baum <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Secondary_Literature_about_Karl_Polanyi#Baum1996|1996, 24-29]]], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“. |
Revision as of 21:31, 4 May 2017
Collaborative Work
Task | Name | Date |
---|---|---|
Typing | Santiago Pinault | 2016 |
Proofreading |
Why not „Über die Freiheit“?
After Gregory Baum [1996, 24-29], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“.
I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that :
In the last line, we can read after the correction, "Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?”. In the archive 02/16, we see that Polanyi tried to change a speech [1-39] in a text [41-96]. In the archive 03/03, he follows this work with a table of contents and some fragments of the same text.