Talk:Ist Sozialismus eine Weltanschauung?: Difference between revisions

From Karl Polanyi
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Why not „Über die Freiheit“? == After Gregory Baum <nowiki>[</nowiki>1996, 24-29], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thom...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Collaborative Work ==
{| class="wikitable"
! Task
! Name
! Date
|-
| Typing
| Santiago Pinault
| 2016
|-
| Proofreading
|
|
|}
== Why not „Über die Freiheit“? ==
== Why not „Über die Freiheit“? ==
After Gregory Baum <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Secondary_Literature_about_Karl_Polanyi#Baum1996|1996, 24-29]]], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“.
After Gregory Baum <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Secondary_Literature_about_Karl_Polanyi#Baum1996|1996, 24-29]]], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“.

Latest revision as of 12:56, 1 July 2017

Collaborative Work

Task Name Date
Typing Santiago Pinault 2016
Proofreading

Why not „Über die Freiheit“?

After Gregory Baum [1996, 24-29], Michele Cangiani and Claus Thomasberger call this text „Über die Freiheit“. In the archive the text is called: “Lecture – N. t. - Notes, 1927“.

I chose „Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?“ because I consider that archives 02/16 and 03/03 are two fragments of the same text, and in this second one we have that :

KPA 02/16, 41

In the last line, we can read after the correction, "Ist Sozialismus ein Weltanschauung?”. In the archive 02/16, we see that Polanyi tried to change a speech [1-39] in a text [41-96]. In the archive 03/03, he follows this work with a table of contents and some fragments of the same text.