Reading Notes on C.E. Vaughan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<div class="hand-written"> {{Page |n°=3}} {{Page |n°=4}} {{Page |n°=5}} {{Page |n°=6}} {{Page |n°=7}} {{Page |n°=8}} {{Page |n°=9}} {{Page |n°=10}} {{Page |n°...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Question}} | |||
<div class="hand-written"> | <div class="hand-written"> | ||
{{Page |n°=3}} | {{Page |n°=3}} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
{{Page |n°=14}} | {{Page |n°=14}} | ||
<u>Polanyi</u> | |||
{| | |||
|rowspan="2"| <u>Polanyi</u> | |||
| material-non-material | |||
|- | |||
| many on few: different “_________ allocation”. | |||
|} | |||
<u>Polanyi</u>: his theory of the common man is an answer to<br /> | |||
(a) Hegel =<br /> | |||
(b) To Rousseau's <br /> | |||
(c) to pseudopsychologism<br /> | |||
(d) to fascist critique of _______<br /> | |||
{{Page |n°=15}} | {{Page |n°=15}} | ||
{| | |||
| […] 318 | |||
| “[…]<br /><u>Polanyi</u>: the “Phil. of Rousseau man”.<br /> | |||
answers […] <u>Hegel's</u>: | |||
|- | |||
| 318 | |||
| Vaughan of … | |||
|- | |||
| 319 | |||
| … “Hegel's for more … | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan="2"|321 | |||
| of M. | |||
|- | |||
| […] | |||
|} | |||
{{Page |n°=16}} | {{Page |n°=16}} | ||
{{Page |n°=17}} | {{Page |n°=17}} | ||
| Line 34: | Line 68: | ||
{{Page |n°=19}} | {{Page |n°=19}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:23, 17 May 2019
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13] […]
Comte was a liberal (laissez-faire) fascist of the Mises type
Polanyi
[14]
Polanyi
| Polanyi | material-non-material |
| many on few: different “_________ allocation”. |
Polanyi: his theory of the common man is an answer to
(a) Hegel =
(b) To Rousseau's
(c) to pseudopsychologism
(d) to fascist critique of _______
[15]
| […] 318 | “[…] Polanyi: the “Phil. of Rousseau man”. answers […] Hegel's: |
| 318 | Vaughan of … |
| 319 | … “Hegel's for more … |
| 321 | of M. |
| […] |
[16] [17] [18] [19]