Marxist Economic Thought: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Santiago Pinault moved page Marxist economic Thought to Marxist Economic Thought over redirect) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Non-Marxists among the representatives of institutionalist methods in economic history… […] | |||
Adherents of institutionalism as represented by Cunningham, Weber, and Pirenne may well be disappointed. Verily from unexpected quarters aid and comfort has come to the enemy. Through Dobb's suggestion that “supply and demand” and “intervention” be accepted as dominant categories in nonmarket economies, Mises and Hayek have, in the last analysis, scored a surprising success. | |||
== Text Informations == | == Text Informations == |
Revision as of 21:07, 25 March 2018
Non-Marxists among the representatives of institutionalist methods in economic history… […]
Adherents of institutionalism as represented by Cunningham, Weber, and Pirenne may well be disappointed. Verily from unexpected quarters aid and comfort has come to the enemy. Through Dobb's suggestion that “supply and demand” and “intervention” be accepted as dominant categories in nonmarket economies, Mises and Hayek have, in the last analysis, scored a surprising success.
Text Informations
Reference: “Marxist economic thought”, Journal of Economic History, 1947, p. 206-207
KPA: 35/07
French Translation: « Marxisme et histoire économique », chap. 5 des Essais de Polanyi, p. 115-118