Marxist Economic Thought: Difference between revisions
(Created page with " ---- “Marxist economic thought”, Journal of Economic History, 1947, p. 206-207 AKP 35/07 « Marxisme et histoire économique », chap. 5 des Essais, p. 115-118") |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Page |n°=1}} ''Studies in the Developement of Capitalism''. By Maurice H. Dobb. New York: International Publishers Company, 1947. Pp. ix, 396. $3.50 | |||
- | He would be a rare economic historian… | ||
“Marxist economic thought”, Journal of Economic History, 1947, p. 206-207 | {{Page |n°=2}} | ||
« Marxisme et histoire économique » | {{Page |n°=3}} | ||
[…] | |||
Non-Marxists among the representatives of institutionalist methods in economic history… […] | |||
Adherents of institutionalism as represented by Cunningham, Weber, and Pirenne may well be disappointed. Verily from unexpected quarters aid and comfort has come to the enemy. Through Dobb's suggestion that “supply and demand” and “intervention” be accepted as dominant categories in nonmarket economies, Mises and Hayek have, in the last analysis, scored a surprising success. | |||
== Text Informations == | |||
'''Reference''': “Marxist economic thought”, ''Journal of Economic History'', 1947, p. 206-207 <br /> | |||
'''KPA''': [[35/07]]<br /> | |||
'''French Translation''': « [[Marxisme et histoire économique]] » | |||
Latest revision as of 04:02, 12 February 2019
[1] Studies in the Developement of Capitalism. By Maurice H. Dobb. New York: International Publishers Company, 1947. Pp. ix, 396. $3.50
He would be a rare economic historian… [2]
[3]
[…] Non-Marxists among the representatives of institutionalist methods in economic history… […]
Adherents of institutionalism as represented by Cunningham, Weber, and Pirenne may well be disappointed. Verily from unexpected quarters aid and comfort has come to the enemy. Through Dobb's suggestion that “supply and demand” and “intervention” be accepted as dominant categories in nonmarket economies, Mises and Hayek have, in the last analysis, scored a surprising success.
Text Informations
Reference: “Marxist economic thought”, Journal of Economic History, 1947, p. 206-207
KPA: 35/07
French Translation: « Marxisme et histoire économique »