Notes of Readings on Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft by Max Weber (Folder IJ 3 f): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Page |n°=105}}<u>M. Weber: Sociological | {{Page |n°=105}}<u>M. Weber: Sociological categories</u> | ||
[…] on “methodological individualism” (also <u>Popper</u>) - <u>____</u> of the individual behaves “{understandly}” <u>Schäffle</u> only regarded as a starting point with his <u>onomatistic</u> assumption or … | |||
{{Page |n°=106}} | |||
[…] Community contractual? | |||
{{Page |n°=107}} | |||
[…] TÖNNIES also p. 1 | |||
Polanyi: MW | |||
MARX sociological approach too much influenced by Marx and Engels and via Tönnies and Sombart. | |||
SH Maine via Tönnies | |||
MAINE | |||
STRUGGLE SELECTION | |||
{{Page |n°=108}} | |||
[…] Pol: | |||
(Verkehrwirtschaft) | |||
Pol: What | |||
{{Page |n°=109}} | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=110}} | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=111}} | |||
[…] | […] | ||
Line 68: | Line 100: | ||
== Document Informations == | == Document Informations == | ||
'''Reference''':<br /> | '''Reference''':<br /> | ||
'''Date''': January 1947<ref>Cf. On January 6, 1947, Polanyi writes to his brother, he is reading all Max Weber. <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Dale 2016]], 232]</ref><br /> | '''Date''': January [[1947]]<ref>Cf. On January 6, 1947, Polanyi writes to his brother, he is reading all Max Weber. <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Dale 2016]], 232]</ref><br /> | ||
'''KPA''': [[07/09]], 100-126 | '''KPA''': [[07/09]], 100-126 | ||
Revision as of 03:27, 1 July 2019
[101] FIRST THREE PAGES have been CARDED
[102] {Strasbo} Ant
[103]Notes p. 1 Sociological terms
SOCIOLOGY | “Sociology” - a discipline aiming at an understanding of social behavior ad its causes & efforts. |
p. 6 Speculation & Empirism in sociology |
[…]
[104]Notes 2 M. Weber: Sociolog. terms
pol. semi-functionalism |
|
anti-psychologist | |
mentalism |
[105]M. Weber: Sociological categories
[…] on “methodological individualism” (also Popper) - ____ of the individual behaves “{understandly}” Schäffle only regarded as a starting point with his onomatistic assumption or …
[106] […] Community contractual?
[107] […] TÖNNIES also p. 1
Polanyi: MW
MARX sociological approach too much influenced by Marx and Engels and via Tönnies and Sombart.
SH Maine via Tönnies
MAINE
STRUGGLE SELECTION
[108] […] Pol:
(Verkehrwirtschaft)
Pol: What
[109] […]
[110] […]
[111] […]
[112] Notes 4. M. Weber: Sociological terms in economics
MARIANNE WEBER Levels of treatment |
MW deals with the {sozeil} on 3 levels: (a) gen. soc. terms |
Cf. Menger | M. Weber’s definitions for collective apparent process are vague on the crucial point. If market motives are the essentially “economic” what in the {veisme} of gainful they certainly are – then the economical be the production of material goods, for the two are {enlivef} different. In effect, if the first definition is mainted there exist no specifically economic objects - if the latter is {achieved} to, then there exist {tnuf} objects, but no specific motives to them. The first position was consistently maintained by Menger, Robbins, etc.; the second is by myself. |
[113] Notes 10 - M. Weber
Scarcity drops: substantive definition
[…]
Pol:
[…]
[117]
important for my critique | … - well, not according to the substantive definition! “choice equaled with exchange à la catallactics” |
Document Informations
Reference:
Date: January 1947[1]
KPA: 07/09, 100-126