Notes of Readings on Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft by Max Weber (Folder IJ 3 f): Difference between revisions

From Karl Polanyi
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
|}
|}


{{Page |n°=105}}<u>M. Weber: Sociological terms</u>
{{Page |n°=105}}<u>M. Weber: Sociological categories</u>


[…] on “methodological individualism” (also <u>Popper</u>) - <u>____</u> of the individual behaves “{understandly}” <u>Schäffle</u> only regarded as a starting point with his <u>onomatistic</u> assumption or …
{{Page |n°=106}}
[…] Community contractual?
{{Page |n°=107}}
[…] TÖNNIES also p. 1
Polanyi: MW
MARX sociological approach too much influenced by Marx and Engels and via Tönnies and Sombart.
SH Maine via Tönnies
MAINE
STRUGGLE SELECTION
{{Page |n°=108}}
[…] Pol:
(Verkehrwirtschaft)
Pol: What
{{Page |n°=109}}
[…]
{{Page |n°=110}}
[…]
{{Page |n°=111}}
[…]
[…]


Line 68: Line 100:
== Document Informations ==
== Document Informations ==
'''Reference''':<br />
'''Reference''':<br />
'''Date''': January 1947<ref>Cf. On January 6, 1947, Polanyi writes to his brother, he is reading all Max Weber. <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Dale 2016]], 232]</ref><br />
'''Date''': January [[1947]]<ref>Cf. On January 6, 1947, Polanyi writes to his brother, he is reading all Max Weber. <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Dale 2016]], 232]</ref><br />
'''KPA''': [[07/09]], 100-126
'''KPA''': [[07/09]], 100-126



Revision as of 03:27, 1 July 2019

[101] FIRST THREE PAGES have been CARDED

[102] {Strasbo} Ant

[103]Notes p. 1 Sociological terms

SOCIOLOGY “Sociology” - a discipline aiming at an understanding of social behavior ad its causes & efforts.
p. 6
Speculation & Empirism in sociology

[…]

[104]Notes 2 M. Weber: Sociolog. terms

pol.
semi-functionalism
anti-psychologist
mentalism

[105]M. Weber: Sociological categories

[…] on “methodological individualism” (also Popper) - ____ of the individual behaves “{understandly}” Schäffle only regarded as a starting point with his onomatistic assumption or …

[106] […] Community contractual?

[107] […] TÖNNIES also p. 1

Polanyi: MW

MARX sociological approach too much influenced by Marx and Engels and via Tönnies and Sombart.

SH Maine via Tönnies

MAINE

STRUGGLE SELECTION

[108] […] Pol:

(Verkehrwirtschaft)

Pol: What

[109] […]

[110] […]

[111] […]

[112] Notes 4. M. Weber: Sociological terms in economics

MARIANNE WEBER
Levels of treatment
MW deals with the {sozeil} on 3 levels:

(a) gen. soc. terms
(b) sociol. of econom. history
(c) {description} ex. hist
Cf. Marianne Weber: Preface to “Typen der Verg_______, p. 181
Oct 1921

Cf. Menger M. Weber’s definitions for collective apparent process are vague on the crucial point. If market motives are the essentially “economic” what in the {veisme} of gainful they certainly are – then the economical be the production of material goods, for the two are {enlivef} different. In effect, if the first definition is mainted there exist no specifically economic objects - if the latter is {achieved} to, then there exist {tnuf} objects, but no specific motives to them. The first position was consistently maintained by Menger, Robbins, etc.; the second is by myself.

[113] Notes 10 - M. Weber

Scarcity drops: substantive definition

[…]

Pol:

[…]

[117]

important for my critique … - well, not according to the substantive definition! “choice equaled with exchange à la catallactics”

Document Informations

Reference:
Date: January 1947[1]
KPA: 07/09, 100-126

Editor's Notes

  1. Cf. On January 6, 1947, Polanyi writes to his brother, he is reading all Max Weber. [Dale 2016, 232]