To Joseph Needham (8 June 1934): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{English to type}} Dear Needham, Father Noel has sent … {} rang Gollancz's to-day. They were rather apologetic, and promised that I would received the communication on o...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{English to type}} | {{English to type}} | ||
== First Letter == | |||
Dear Needham, | Dear Needham, | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
… Pacifism of Tolstoi, in spite {{Page |n°=15}} of the reactionary ideology of Dostojewski. […] | … Pacifism of Tolstoi, in spite {{Page |n°=15}} of the reactionary ideology of Dostojewski. […] | ||
== Second Letter == | |||
{{Page |n°=16}} Dear Needham, | |||
[…] | |||
Yes, also Macmurray is somewhat pessimistic about Tawney, because he is supposed to be very slow to move. I have not yet arranged … […] | |||
I could not help feeling at a recent Conference at High Leigh, where Macmurray {{Page |n°=17}} read several papers on Religion and Politics, that he has now reached a stage in his thinking which designates a signal advance in our general philosophical position and is perhaps the beginning of a very great change in the method of dealing with these subjects. But Canon Ravens defection would be a very severe blow, and I hope that this is not his final word. […] | |||
== Letter Informations == | == Letter Informations == | ||
'''Reference''':<br /> | '''Reference''':<br /> | ||
'''KPA''': [[56/11]], 14- | '''KPA''': [[56/11]], 14-17 |
Revision as of 02:34, 18 February 2020
First Letter
Dear Needham,
Father Noel has sent …
{} rang Gollancz's to-day. They were rather apologetic, and promised that I would received the communication on our meeting of May 7th in a day or two.
… Pacifism of Tolstoi, in spite [15] of the reactionary ideology of Dostojewski. […]
Second Letter
[16] Dear Needham,
[…]
Yes, also Macmurray is somewhat pessimistic about Tawney, because he is supposed to be very slow to move. I have not yet arranged … […]
I could not help feeling at a recent Conference at High Leigh, where Macmurray [17] read several papers on Religion and Politics, that he has now reached a stage in his thinking which designates a signal advance in our general philosophical position and is perhaps the beginning of a very great change in the method of dealing with these subjects. But Canon Ravens defection would be a very severe blow, and I hope that this is not his final word. […]
Letter Informations
Reference:
KPA: 56/11, 14-17