Talk:Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes II: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Where is this essay? What could be its content? -- [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]], 16 June 2017 (BST) | * Where is this essay? What could be its content? -- [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]], 16 June 2017 (BST) | ||
=== A | === A Polanyian Trade Cycle Theory? === | ||
“P. had had trade cycle theory which later Hayek produced and was then shattered by Keynes. P.'s theory was never stated. It was naturalistic theory based on the nature of production, a substantive theory. P. was never much interested in this.” What is all this about? --[[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]) 09:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC) | “P. had had trade cycle theory which later Hayek produced and was then shattered by Keynes. P.'s theory was never stated. It was naturalistic theory based on the nature of production, a substantive theory. P. was never much interested in this.” What is all this about? --[[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]) 09:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:07, 26 December 2017
Collaborative Work
Questions
"My Essay (April 30/56)"
- Where is this essay? What could be its content? -- Santiago Pinault, 16 June 2017 (BST)
A Polanyian Trade Cycle Theory?
“P. had had trade cycle theory which later Hayek produced and was then shattered by Keynes. P.'s theory was never stated. It was naturalistic theory based on the nature of production, a substantive theory. P. was never much interested in this.” What is all this about? --Santiago Pinault (talk) 09:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)