Notebook XV: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(in) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{Page |n°=69}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont) | {{Page |n°=69}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont) | ||
== Notes of readings on Tillich? == | |||
{{Page |n°=70}} Tillich (13)<br /> | {{Page |n°=70}} Tillich (13)<br /> | ||
the _____ about the {dunie}<br /> | the _____ about the {dunie}<br /> | ||
possibility is a human possibility | possibility {is/in} a human possibility | ||
”Were an event only a foreign substance in History it come ______ be absorbed by history nor and it continent to be operative in history! 138<br /> | |||
the „____ of time”:<br /> | |||
_____________: ___ rise out of history<br /> | |||
Spernaturalism: foreign injection into history 138 | |||
„Bank does not recognize the value of ____ ________ about ____”, of religion ______ ______… | |||
{{Page |n°=71}} | {{Page |n°=71}} What is this human entity? Can it be thought of only is something without the divine without the capacity for receiving answers from the divine and for ______ ga_____ of the divine?” 139 | ||
Certainly _____ is not revelation (is a human possibility, while revelation is impossibility (divine possibility). Yet revelation ____ not be even a divine <u> | Certainly _____ is not revelation (is a human possibility, while revelation is impossibility (divine possibility). Yet revelation ____ not be even a divine <u>possibility</u> -- revelation is indeed revelation to man - if it _____ not be received by means of {Yorus} of _____ as human phenomena” (140) | ||
Theology is not anthropology (heads to _________ and ______) | Theology is not anthropology (heads to _________ and ______) | ||
{{Page |n°=72}} | {{Page |n°=72}} „Hebelier's is a fortress _______ of human action ravaged of sin and without ____ to the divine or to the demonic” His _____ leaching on point. | ||
Refuses to ________ <u>theological ethics</u>. | |||
Tolley: It is an _______ of existence without reference to both divine & human _________. | |||
We live in three dimensions:<br /> | |||
1) <br /> | |||
2) form ______ it<br /> | |||
3) third dimension: divine mountain top<br /> | |||
demonic abyss. | |||
<u>True/u> is every day & secular… | |||
„One who does not recognize that fact and who, mistaken, holding to the belief ___. | |||
{{Page |n°=73}} two dimensional reality renounces the religions conflict against physical, social and spiritual demonic forces, in _____ journal of economics interests. | |||
In this respect the battle on {theology} is _________ in ____ of guilty.” 144 | |||
Liberal theology, through its belief in <u>progress</u>, has been guilty as of obscuring the demonic. | |||
{Barth}: _______ of human activities from both divine and demonic progress… | |||
„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145 | |||
== == | |||
{{Page |n°= | {{Page |n°=74}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)<br /> | ||
The influence of the working class a <u>{nuisance} value</u>. | |||
Positive _____<br /> | Positive _____<br /> | ||
Line 35: | Line 62: | ||
<u>more ______</u> | <u>more ______</u> | ||
a) <br /> | |||
b) | |||
{{Page |n°=75}} […] | {{Page |n°=75}} […] | ||
{ | … is Jesus Christus ein <u>Rechtig</u>___ und ein <u>Wahrheit _____</u>, kein Gesellschaft, kein {Sikengott}, kein Kirchen-, ____-, und K________gott! 67 | ||
„Kleanthes” […] | […] „Jesus ist Sieger!“ | ||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=76}} […] war theological. | |||
„Kleanthes” Dialog von 24 B____ eine philosophische-dialektische __________ __ Gottheit…“ | |||
His _____ ___ ____ theological _______ law, theology, etc. | |||
Hegel […]. | |||
{{Page |n°=77}} <u>Marx on the „Corporative State”</u> | {{Page |n°=77}} <u>Marx on the „Corporative State”</u> | ||
Line 55: | Line 94: | ||
<u>{France}</u>: International exchange ([…]) | <u>{France}</u>: International exchange ([…]) | ||
Germany (______)<br /> | |||
England<br /> | |||
Japan<br /> | |||
Italy<br /> | |||
Austria<br /> | |||
<u>Yougoslavia</u> etc. Democracy ______ | |||
{A very […] | |||
[…] | […] | ||
Line 60: | Line 107: | ||
{{Page |n°=79}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont) | {{Page |n°=79}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont) | ||
Exact nature of crisis […]; unemployment | Exact nature of crisis must be {assertained} working class ____ in its ______, principles, _______ both ___ […]; unemployment | ||
[…] | […] | ||
Line 67: | Line 114: | ||
b) […] | b) […] | ||
{{Page |n°=80}} à la Hegel + | {{Page |n°=80}} à la Hegel + a {materialisation} of the Corporations and States of the Realm. But these are certainly, very close analyses. | ||
It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command. | It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command. | ||
Line 74: | Line 121: | ||
political sphere - economic sphere | political sphere - economic sphere | ||
1) Hegel refuses to accept the | 1) Hegel refuses to accept the individual as the wih of the political State. | ||
He prefers the <u>{facial}</u> and <u>economic life</u> the later as _________ corporations. | He prefers the <u>{facial/fascists}</u> and <u>economic life</u> the later as _________ corporations. | ||
The State emerges out of the family and economic life […] | The State emerges out of the family and economic life […] of nature out of which the ____ of the State leaps (23) | ||
{{Page |n°=82}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont) | {{Page |n°=82}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont) |
Revision as of 12:04, 30 November 2019
[68] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
[69] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
Notes of readings on Tillich?
[70] Tillich (13)
the _____ about the {dunie}
possibility {is/in} a human possibility
”Were an event only a foreign substance in History it come ______ be absorbed by history nor and it continent to be operative in history! 138
the „____ of time”:
_____________: ___ rise out of history
Spernaturalism: foreign injection into history 138
„Bank does not recognize the value of ____ ________ about ____”, of religion ______ ______…
[71] What is this human entity? Can it be thought of only is something without the divine without the capacity for receiving answers from the divine and for ______ ga_____ of the divine?” 139
Certainly _____ is not revelation (is a human possibility, while revelation is impossibility (divine possibility). Yet revelation ____ not be even a divine possibility -- revelation is indeed revelation to man - if it _____ not be received by means of {Yorus} of _____ as human phenomena” (140)
Theology is not anthropology (heads to _________ and ______)
[72] „Hebelier's is a fortress _______ of human action ravaged of sin and without ____ to the divine or to the demonic” His _____ leaching on point. Refuses to ________ theological ethics.
Tolley: It is an _______ of existence without reference to both divine & human _________.
We live in three dimensions:
1)
2) form ______ it
3) third dimension: divine mountain top
demonic abyss.
True/u> is every day & secular…
„One who does not recognize that fact and who, mistaken, holding to the belief ___.
[73] two dimensional reality renounces the religions conflict against physical, social and spiritual demonic forces, in _____ journal of economics interests.
In this respect the battle on {theology} is _________ in ____ of guilty.” 144
Liberal theology, through its belief in progress, has been guilty as of obscuring the demonic.
{Barth}: _______ of human activities from both divine and demonic progress…
„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145
[74] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
The influence of the working class a {nuisance} value.
Positive _____
a)
b)
c)
d)
more ______
a)
b)
[75] […]
… is Jesus Christus ein Rechtig___ und ein Wahrheit _____, kein Gesellschaft, kein {Sikengott}, kein Kirchen-, ____-, und K________gott! 67
[…] „Jesus ist Sieger!“
[…]
[76] […] war theological.
„Kleanthes” Dialog von 24 B____ eine philosophische-dialektische __________ __ Gottheit…“
His _____ ___ ____ theological _______ law, theology, etc.
Hegel […].
[77] Marx on the „Corporative State”
There is a Criticism of Marx in the Corporative State which is of very real interest.
It was a _______. We are faced by a ____ view. Fascism […] Hegel …
Capitalism was coming, now it is outgoing. But we do not overate …
Hegel gave an …
[78] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
{France}: International exchange ([…])
Germany (______)
England
Japan
Italy
Austria
Yougoslavia etc. Democracy ______
{A very […]
[…]
[79] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
Exact nature of crisis must be {assertained} working class ____ in its ______, principles, _______ both ___ […]; unemployment
[…]
a) left […]
b) […]
[80] à la Hegel + a {materialisation} of the Corporations and States of the Realm. But these are certainly, very close analyses.
It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command.
[81] ? __________ Gesellschaft = economic life
political sphere - economic sphere
1) Hegel refuses to accept the individual as the wih of the political State.
He prefers the {facial/fascists} and economic life the later as _________ corporations.
The State emerges out of the family and economic life […] of nature out of which the ____ of the State leaps (23)
[82] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
Two ______ of balance: […]
[83] When Hegel […]
First: What does Hegel say: family and economic life are stated to be that […]
What about the {individualized}
[84] “Like ___, the man” The absence of servant class … […]
[85] Christianity an M economics
I In search of a starting point
Christianity is … […]
[86] English society
[…]
[87] For ______ interest society is restricted to that aspect of society in which it is a _______ of , a relationship of persons.
This implies […]
That is about the relationships of man to God.
… the relation of man to man
Ad 3: Jesus did not able to the law ___ meaning of religion […]
a relationship of persons.
[88] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
What is the market economy?
[…]
[89] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
[…]
[90] Theory of the Fascist Transformation (cont)
Something happening before our eyes
1) Depth and exclusion
2) Universality -
3) […]
4) […]
5) […]
6) […]
7) […]
[…]
[91] revealed to us in Jesus Christ. Only if economics bear any reference to this its achieve issue can we be concerned with it as Xtians.
II. When and in what _____ do social questions a bear reference to Xty?
[…]
[92] I What Xty is about the relationship of man to God
II. That this relationship is ________ with the relationship of mankind to God
III. That this relationship of mankind to God ______ on the relation of man _______.
Ad 1.
1d 2: […]
[93] Society as …
[94] […]
[95] […]
To such a society the Xtian says no! He leaves this ____ Jew left it the _____, […].
This was […]
The Gospel was apocalyptic. The disruption of society was […]. It was d________ as untenable. […] order of things was proclaimed.
[96] Xtian sociology
[97] b) The State of mankind - that's the one ____ing interest.
How do we get the knowledge … […]
[98] James […]
[99] Bryce: The American Commonwealth
542:
„Economic theory ___ not stop them, for practical when are proud of getting on without theory” 542
„The […]
[100] […]
[101] […]
[102] […]
[103] […]
[104] […]
[105] 16 {April} '35
Copec : Vol. N
Very good
[106] Adams (continued) Epic of thi____ 1931
p. 37 […]
[107]
[108] […]
5) Xtianity about wiped out: a) Russia
b) Germany
[109] …1935 possibilities as _____ to 1924:
[110] […] Yes, but they {withdrown} this trend with the help of the mother {Comity}; and […]
Polanyi:
[111] Jesus' apocalyptic attitude referred not _______ but to Jewish society. His premises justified by events (__ ____)
What is the essentially happening to the World?
[…] … problem of the social crisis by „deshumanizing” life radically. This is, of course, _____.
The World and the individual
_______ the Temporal
Sin - and Society
[112] This society destroyed leg X because it ___ not know the will of God.
The Church ____ […]
[113] 1.
2.
3.
4. The Church should be and not do.
prophecy!
5.
6. „Quality of life“ (John!) … […]
7.
[114] Adams (cont)
[…]
[115] […] … U.S.A. (Very ______ foul! […] 1924-1933 […]
[116] […]
[117] They […]
Negro slaves : up to 1698 …
[118] [119] [120] [121] [122] Charles of Beard […]
[123]
[124]
[125]
[126]
[127]
[128]
[129]
[130]
[131] Thorstein Veblen: The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) New York Vanguard Press 1927
[132] […]
[133] Notes on Fascism
Organised Capitalism (from the …)
[134]
[135]
[136]
[137]
[138]
[139]
[140]
[141]
[142]
[143]
[144]
[145]
[146]
[147] […]
{More}: Personality: …
{Betrialism}
Jewish Question − Xristianity
Bergson: judeo-christian
————— ______: judeo-Protestant
Marx:
Rosenberg: Antisemitism explained
[148] G. Feder
[…]
Positive Xristianity: __________
Negative Xristianity: Rosenberg {makes} Xristianity negative.
On mysticism: anti-individualism
[…]
Marx: […]
progressive revelation of the nature of man
[149] {Ponizhom}: biocentric theory of community
[153] Rosenberg
[154] Things to check:
Bergson:
[154] … on Spann's personal relationship