Notebook XIV: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground? | incompatible: on principle or on practical ground? | ||
{{Page |n°=8}} … <u>fall into the abyss | {{Page |n°=8}} … <u>fall into the abyss</u> | ||
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u> | The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u>causes of the crisis.</u> | ||
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis. | The apocalyptic nature of the crisis. | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
{{Page |n°=15}} What is meant by the <u>mental</u> character of historical happening {in our} that? | {{Page |n°=15}} What is meant by the <u>mental</u> character of historical happening {in our} that? | ||
{{Page |n°=16}} Mannheim's 3 essays …… <u>sudden change</u> | {{Page |n°=16}} Mannheim's 3 essays …… <u>sudden change</u> […] | ||
Marx was ____ to accept the <u>bulk</u> of the permanent laws ___ (he put … | |||
{{Page |n°=17}} | |||
{{Page |n°=18}} | |||
{{Page |n°=19}} | |||
{{Page |n°=20}} | |||
{{Page |n°=21}} Sept '35 | {{Page |n°=21}} Sept '35 | ||
{{Page |n°=22}} | |||
{{Page |n°=23}} | |||
{{Page |n°=24}} | |||
{{Page |n°=25}} | |||
{{Page |n°=26}} | |||
{{Page |n°=27}} | |||
{{Page |n°=28}} | |||
{{Page |n°=29}} | |||
{{Page |n°=30}} | |||
{{Page |n°=31}} | |||
{{Page |n°=32}} | |||
{{Page |n°=33}} | |||
{{Page |n°=34}} | |||
{{Page |n°=35}} | |||
{{Page |n°=36}} | |||
{{Page |n°=37}} The primary religions community is the family | {{Page |n°=37}} The primary religions community is the family | ||
Revision as of 21:28, 26 June 2019
[3] England, die Völk_____lt
Zwei … […]
The Law of sudden changes
[4] Kenneth on Jews:<br /
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
[…]
[5] Eric {Fenn}'s memo:
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitudes) within the Confes. Ch. on {Thc}
[…]
[6] Class antagonism: but the […]
[7] Mannheim on fascism
No {solution/situation} is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as artificial. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.
Capitalism and Democracy
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?
[8] … fall into the abyss
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the causes of the crisis.
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.
Umbau ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but
principis ______ “Marx's historical law”
Interdependance is _____ totality cf. partiel (very good)
[9] […] Eckhart […]
[10] … Selbstrationalisierung
Zur kritik Mannheims
[11]
[12]
[13] Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.
Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a definite happening?
[…]
But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.
[15] What is meant by the mental character of historical happening {in our} that?
[16] Mannheim's 3 essays …… sudden change […]
Marx was ____ to accept the bulk of the permanent laws ___ (he put …
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21] Sept '35
[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] The primary religions community is the family
Community