Notebook XIV: Difference between revisions

From Karl Polanyi
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:KPA 07-08, 1.jpg|500px|thumb|right]]
[[File:KPA 07-08, 1.jpg|500px|thumb|right]]
<div style="font-family:Garamond;">
<div style="hand-written">
{{Page |n°=3}} England, die Völk_____lt<br />
{{Page |n°=3}} England, die Völk_____lt<br />
Zwei … […]
Zwei … […]
Line 7: Line 7:


{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br /
{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br /
The Church has no …
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“<br />
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.


“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution“<br />
[…]
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.


{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br />
{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br />
Line 18: Line 18:
{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […]
{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […]


{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>_______</u><br />
{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>fascism</u><br />
No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined
No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;


Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!


The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.


Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br />
Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br />
<u>Capitalism and _______cy</u>
<u>Capitalism and Democracy</u><br />
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?
 
{{Page |n°=8}} … <u>fall into the abyss</u>causes of the crisis.</u>
 
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u>
 
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.
 
Umbau ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but <br />
 
principis ______ “Marx's historical law”
 
Interdependance is _____ <u>totality</u> cf. <u>partiel</u> (very good)
 
{{Page |n°=9}} […] Eckhart […]


{{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung  
{{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung  


<u>Zur kritik Mannheims</u>
<u>Zur kritik Mannheims</u>
{{Page |n°=11}}
{{Page |n°=12}}


{{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.
{{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.

Revision as of 20:36, 26 June 2019

[3] England, die Völk_____lt
Zwei … […]

The Law of sudden changes

[4] Kenneth on Jews:<br / “Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.

[…]

[5] Eric {Fenn}'s memo:
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitudes) within the Confes. Ch. on {Thc} […]

[6] Class antagonism: but the […]

[7] Mannheim on fascism
No {solution/situation} is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;

Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!

The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.

Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as artificial. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.
Capitalism and Democracy
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?

[8]fall into the abysscauses of the crisis.

The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the

The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.

Umbau ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but

principis ______ “Marx's historical law”

Interdependance is _____ totality cf. partiel (very good)

[9] […] Eckhart […]

[10] … Selbstrationalisierung

Zur kritik Mannheims

[11]

[12]

[13] Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.

Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a definite happening?

[…]

But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.

[15] What is meant by the mental character of historical happening {in our} that?

[16] Mannheim's 3 essays …… sudden change

[21] Sept '35

[37] The primary religions community is the family

Community

Document Informations

Reference:
Date: 1934-1935
KPA: 07/08, 1-52