Notebook XIV: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:KPA 07-08, 1.jpg|500px|thumb|right]] | [[File:KPA 07-08, 1.jpg|500px|thumb|right]] | ||
<div style=" | <div style="hand-written"> | ||
{{Page |n°=3}} England, die Völk_____lt<br /> | {{Page |n°=3}} England, die Völk_____lt<br /> | ||
Zwei … […] | Zwei … […] | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br / | {{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br / | ||
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“<br /> | |||
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews. | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br /> | {{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br /> | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […] | {{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […] | ||
{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u> | {{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>fascism</u><br /> | ||
No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined | No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”; | ||
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change | Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake! | ||
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last. | The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last. | ||
Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br /> | Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br /> | ||
<u>Capitalism and | <u>Capitalism and Democracy</u><br /> | ||
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground? | |||
{{Page |n°=8}} … <u>fall into the abyss</u>causes of the crisis.</u> | |||
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u> | |||
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis. | |||
Umbau ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but <br /> | |||
principis ______ “Marx's historical law” | |||
Interdependance is _____ <u>totality</u> cf. <u>partiel</u> (very good) | |||
{{Page |n°=9}} […] Eckhart […] | |||
{{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung | {{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung | ||
<u>Zur kritik Mannheims</u> | <u>Zur kritik Mannheims</u> | ||
{{Page |n°=11}} | |||
{{Page |n°=12}} | |||
{{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics. | {{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics. |
Revision as of 20:36, 26 June 2019
[3] England, die Völk_____lt
Zwei … […]
The Law of sudden changes
[4] Kenneth on Jews:<br /
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
[…]
[5] Eric {Fenn}'s memo:
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitudes) within the Confes. Ch. on {Thc}
[…]
[6] Class antagonism: but the […]
[7] Mannheim on fascism
No {solution/situation} is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as artificial. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.
Capitalism and Democracy
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?
[8] … fall into the abysscauses of the crisis.
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.
Umbau ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but
principis ______ “Marx's historical law”
Interdependance is _____ totality cf. partiel (very good)
[9] […] Eckhart […]
[10] … Selbstrationalisierung
Zur kritik Mannheims
[11]
[12]
[13] Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.
Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a definite happening?
[…]
But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.
[15] What is meant by the mental character of historical happening {in our} that?
[16] Mannheim's 3 essays …… sudden change
[21] Sept '35
[37] The primary religions community is the family
Community