Freedom and Technology (Planned book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Reconstructed Table of | == Reconstructed Table of Contents == | ||
=== 2. The young Hegel === | |||
'''Why?''' - “Chapter Two (…is) still to be written. [It is] about (Chp. 2) the young Hegel.”<ref>See. To Thomas A. Bledsoe (3 January 1959), 11.</ref> | |||
=== 3. The young Marx === | |||
'''Why?''' - “Chapter Three (…is) still to be written. [It is] about (…) the young Marx (Chp. 3)”<ref>See. To Thomas A. Bledsoe (3 January 1959), 11.</ref> | |||
=== 4. On post-existentialist thought === | |||
'''Why?''' - “…there ought to be a Chapter Four: On post-existentialist thought.”<ref>See. To Thomas A. Bledsoe (3 January 1959), 11.</ref> | |||
'''Content''' - …Research proved lengthy and difficult on account of the tortuous French. However, the paradox of Pasternak might offer a key to that of Sartre - both are noble representatives of a counter-revolutionary era, reactions to a barebones rationalism of the Fascist and Bolshevik holocaust. My wife remarked that Pasternak's gripping lyricism is a direct descendant of Jens Peter Jacobsen, the Danish poet (1885&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;), and added: - but so is Sartre of Kierkegaard (1855&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;), of course. In this light French existentialism (like Pasternak) <u>provokes a next step</u>. In practical terms this means that my positive thoughts on freedom may be easier to present in the face of Sartre: Pasternak than of Sartre alone.<ref>See. To Thomas A. Bledsoe (3 January 1959), 11.</ref> | |||
=== The discovery of society === | === The discovery of society === | ||
=== The social discontent === | === The social discontent === | ||
=== Robert Owen === | === Robert Owen === | ||
=== Bernard Shaw === | |||
=== George Bernard Shaw === | |||
<ref>See. [[Abraham_Rotstein,_Weekend_Notes_XXII#Shaw_.285.29|“Weekend Notes” XXII]]</ref> | <ref>See. [[Abraham_Rotstein,_Weekend_Notes_XXII#Shaw_.285.29|“Weekend Notes” XXII]]</ref> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 51: | ||
=== The Speech === | === The Speech === | ||
* [[Freedom and Technology (Speech)]] | * [[Freedom and Technology (Speech)]] | ||
== References == | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 22:42, 6 April 2019
Reconstructed Table of Contents
2. The young Hegel
Why? - “Chapter Two (…is) still to be written. [It is] about (Chp. 2) the young Hegel.”[1]
3. The young Marx
Why? - “Chapter Three (…is) still to be written. [It is] about (…) the young Marx (Chp. 3)”[2]
4. On post-existentialist thought
Why? - “…there ought to be a Chapter Four: On post-existentialist thought.”[3]
Content - …Research proved lengthy and difficult on account of the tortuous French. However, the paradox of Pasternak might offer a key to that of Sartre - both are noble representatives of a counter-revolutionary era, reactions to a barebones rationalism of the Fascist and Bolshevik holocaust. My wife remarked that Pasternak's gripping lyricism is a direct descendant of Jens Peter Jacobsen, the Danish poet (1885&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;), and added: - but so is Sartre of Kierkegaard (1855&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;&nsbp;), of course. In this light French existentialism (like Pasternak) provokes a next step. In practical terms this means that my positive thoughts on freedom may be easier to present in the face of Sartre: Pasternak than of Sartre alone.[4]
The discovery of society
The social discontent
Robert Owen
George Bernard Shaw
Contract
Text in English to type
Text Informations
Reference:
Date: 1957-1958
KPA: 38/13 (contracts, 10 p.)
Other Languages:
| Lge | Name |
|---|---|
| DE | |
| FR |
See also
For the book
In Abraham Rotstein's “Week-end Notes”:
- On a book called Freedom and Technology: IX, (2) XVII, (3) XIX, (4) XX, (5) XXI, (6) XXII, (7) XXIII, (8) XXIV
- Freedom and Technology - General Comments: XI, (2) XII, (3) XIII, (4) XIV, (5) XV
- Introduction to Freedom and Technology: XII