Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes XXII: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes| Weekend Notes (Overview)]] | [[Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes| Weekend Notes (Overview)]] | ||
== Shaw (5) == | == Shaw (5) == | ||
{{Page |n°=2}} P. thinks that the Shaw chapter should lead up to the postulate of the reform of human consciousness. That is what the chapter would be based on. It would be at the end and perhaps this could only be done by a poet who was 100 years old. | |||
The Shavian consciousness is based on the consciousness of the reality of the society. One would have to watch out for the Eastern philosophy (The Simpleton of the U.I.) | |||
Shaw wanted us to know that he had taken his wisdom from Marx. Is that so? He wasn't a believer in democracy. […] {{English to type}} | |||
Shaw's anti-democracy may be a step towards the reality of society {{Page |n°=3}} {{Page |n°=4}} {{Page |n°=5}} {{Page |n°=6}} {{Page |n°=7}} {{Page |n°=8}} {{Page |n°=9}} {{Page |n°=10}} {{Page |n°=11}} {{Page |n°=12}} {{Page |n°=13}} {{Page |n°=14}} {{Page |n°=15}} {{Page |n°=16}} {{Page |n°=17}} {{Page |n°=18}} {{Page |n°=19}} {{Page |n°=20}} {{Page |n°=21}} {{Page |n°=22}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Paul Medow (2) == | == Paul Medow (2) == | ||
{{Page |n°=23}} Paul has used Schumpeter's second chapter of his theory of economic development and applied it to two neo-mercantilist countries, Japan and Russia. | |||
[…] | |||
In ethics he wants to use Fromm's and P.'s position on the market and in economics he wants to establish Schumpeter. | |||
[…] A.F. Burns in the Rockefeller report uses Schumpetarian economics … […] | |||
{{Page |n°=24}} … Adam Smith … Mandeville, the becs, {{Page |n°=25}} {{Page |n°=26}} {{Page |n°=27}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Freedom and Technology (6) == | == Freedom and Technology (6) == | ||
{{Page |n°=28}} One is thrown back on the reality of society. Both the freedom question and the technological question involve the question of what is society. | |||
The reality of it runs over the recognition that we cannot contract out. […] | |||
Jaspers gives support to the idea of our civilization being technological but doesn't link to the freedom. | |||
{{Page |n°=29}} {{Page |n°=30}} {{Page |n°=31}} {{Page |n°=32}} {{Page |n°=33}} {{Page |n°=34}} {{Page |n°=35}} {{Page |n°=36}} {{Page |n°=37}} {{Page |n°=38}} {{Page |n°=39}} {{Page |n°=40}} {{Page |n°=41}} {{Page |n°=42}} {{Page |n°=43}} {{Page |n°=44}} {{Page |n°=45}} {{Page |n°=46}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Marx (5) == | == Marx (5) == | ||
{{Page |n°=47}} {{Page |n°=46}} {{Page |n°=48}} {{Page |n°=49}} {{Page |n°=50}} {{Page |n°=51}} {{Page |n°=52}} {{Page |n°=53}} {{Page |n°=54}} {{Page |n°=55}} {{Page |n°=56}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Robert Owen (7) == | == Robert Owen (7) == | ||
{{Page |n°=57}} {{Page |n°=58}} {{Page |n°=59}} {{Page |n°=60}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Interdisciplinary Project (9) == | == Interdisciplinary Project (9) == | ||
{{Page |n°=61}} {{Page |n°=62}} {{Page |n°=63}} {{Page |n°=64}} {{Page |n°=65}} {{Page |n°=66}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Metaphysics of Everyday Life (2) == | == Metaphysics of Everyday Life (2) == | ||
{{Page |n°=67}} {{Page |n°=68}} {{Page |n°=69}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Comments on my "Not by Organization Alone", Draft #4 == | == Comments on my "Not by Organization Alone", Draft #4 == | ||
{{Page |n°=70}} {{Page |n°=71}} {{Page |n°=72}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
=== "The Capitalist Manifesto" (2) === | === "The Capitalist Manifesto" (2) === | ||
{{Page |n°=73}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
=== Absolutes === | === Absolutes === | ||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
=== Adam Smith === | === Adam Smith === | ||
{{Page |n°=74}} | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | |||
== Text Informations == | == Text Informations == | ||
'''Date''': April 27 - May 4, 1958 (Interview)<br /> | '''Date''': April 27 - May 4, [[1958]] (Interview)<br /> | ||
'''KPA''': 45/18 | '''KPA''': [[45/18]] | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 6 April 2019
Shaw (5)
[2] P. thinks that the Shaw chapter should lead up to the postulate of the reform of human consciousness. That is what the chapter would be based on. It would be at the end and perhaps this could only be done by a poet who was 100 years old.
The Shavian consciousness is based on the consciousness of the reality of the society. One would have to watch out for the Eastern philosophy (The Simpleton of the U.I.)
Shaw wanted us to know that he had taken his wisdom from Marx. Is that so? He wasn't a believer in democracy. […]
Text in English to type
Shaw's anti-democracy may be a step towards the reality of society [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]
Paul Medow (2)
[23] Paul has used Schumpeter's second chapter of his theory of economic development and applied it to two neo-mercantilist countries, Japan and Russia.
[…]
In ethics he wants to use Fromm's and P.'s position on the market and in economics he wants to establish Schumpeter.
[…] A.F. Burns in the Rockefeller report uses Schumpetarian economics … […]
[24] … Adam Smith … Mandeville, the becs, [25] [26] [27]
Freedom and Technology (6)
[28] One is thrown back on the reality of society. Both the freedom question and the technological question involve the question of what is society.
The reality of it runs over the recognition that we cannot contract out. […]
Jaspers gives support to the idea of our civilization being technological but doesn't link to the freedom.
[29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]
Marx (5)
[47] [46] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56]
Robert Owen (7)
[57] [58] [59] [60]
Interdisciplinary Project (9)
[61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66]
Metaphysics of Everyday Life (2)
[67] [68] [69] ↑
Comments on my "Not by Organization Alone", Draft #4
[70] [71] [72]
Notes
"The Capitalist Manifesto" (2)
[73]
Absolutes
Adam Smith
[74]