Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes XVII: Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Robert Owen (4) == | == Robert Owen (4) == | ||
{{Page |n°=2}} The Village of Union is an intricate thing which P. has now seen. The first Village was an utter failure and nothing happened. He was told: we don't understand it, it isn't voluntary and how do you run it without capital? … […] | |||
{{Page |n°=3}} We haven't … […] | |||
{{Page |n°=4}} … […] To abandon all belief was Owen's religion to be taught to man. His real desire was to do good to the human race and he thought that religions were not only wrong but caused all the evil. … […] | |||
{{Page |n°=5}} With Calvinism … […] | |||
{{Page |n°=6}} {{Page |n°=7}} {{Page |n°=8}} {{Page |n°=9}} {{Page |n°=10}} {{Page |n°=11}} {{Page |n°=12}} {{Page |n°=13}} {{Page |n°=14}} {{Page |n°=15}} {{Page |n°=16}} {{Page |n°=17}} {{Page |n°=18}} {{Page |n°=19}} {{Page |n°=20}} {{Page |n°=21}} {{Page |n°=22}} {{Page |n°=23}} {{Page |n°=24}} {{Page |n°=25}} {{Page |n°=26}} {{Page |n°=27}} {{Page |n°=28}} | |||
{{Page |n°=29}} where there is competition individuals take the losses. […] | |||
(See also The Early Marx for points in common, and Freedom and Technology.) | |||
[[#mw-page-base|↑]] | [[#mw-page-base|↑]] | ||
Revision as of 00:23, 4 April 2019
Text in English to type
Robert Owen (4)
[2] The Village of Union is an intricate thing which P. has now seen. The first Village was an utter failure and nothing happened. He was told: we don't understand it, it isn't voluntary and how do you run it without capital? … […]
[3] We haven't … […]
[4] … […] To abandon all belief was Owen's religion to be taught to man. His real desire was to do good to the human race and he thought that religions were not only wrong but caused all the evil. … […]
[5] With Calvinism … […]
[6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]
[29] where there is competition individuals take the losses. […]
(See also The Early Marx for points in common, and Freedom and Technology.)
The Early Marx (4)
Freedom and Technology (2)
Rousseau Paradox
Shaw (3)
Camus
Interdisciplinary Project (5)
Notes
Money (2)
Sumner
Sumner nurtured the present fathers of American thought. He said that the trouble with primitive m[a]n was that he was lazy, and gave no forethought and was greedy. He had all the bad qualities of economistic premises and no good ones.
Man's original endowment is poverty - it is nature surviving in society. Therefore pauperian and the needy require no explanation. This view was valid until 25 years ago in America.
It was only Malinowski who followed up the opposite. The New Deal was head-on collision with Sumner of Yale. Therefore, the Great Transformation was banned from Penn. State (it was removed from the library) and a number of men were made to leave, including the head of department. Keyes then published a reader, and put P.'s Commentary article into it. Keyes appointed two of P.'s students. ↑