32/03: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=== Two Meanings of Economy === | === Two Meanings of Economy === | ||
{{Page |n°= | {{Page |n°=6}} Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]])) | ||
Revision as of 19:38, 5 April 2018
KPI Description
| Title | Interdisciplinary project 1953-1955: “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” (not for publication), vol. 1 – Columbia University |
| Author | Polanyi, Karl |
| Description | File consists of a bound volume of typed memoranda, some of which are annotated, (Memo 20, 19, 16, 11 and 15), titled “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” for the interdisciplinary project 1953-1955. Memorandum 20 (October 1955) was written by Karl Polanyi and is titled "The Two Meanings of Economic". 51p. (See files: 31/16, 32/04, 36/06) |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10694/895 |
| Date | 2010-09-23 |
Contents
Two Meanings of Economy
[6] Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction Santiago Pinault (talk))