09/04: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
| Title | |||
| Karl Polanyi: Notes on readings, 1934-1946 | |||
|- | |||
| Author | |||
| Polanyi, Karl | |||
|- | |||
| Description | |||
| File consists of Karl Polanyi’s hand-written and annotated typed notes on topics such as pacifism, the fall of Christianity, with references to G. J. Heering, A. Huxley, and G. Heard, among others. The notes are in English. | |||
|- | |||
| URI | |||
| [http://hdl.handle.net/10694/529 http://hdl.handle.net/10694/529] | |||
|- | |||
| Archive Date | |||
| 2010-08-23 | |||
|} | |||
== Contents == | |||
{{Page |n°=80}} Burke, <u>Political Economy in the 1750-1800 period</u> | {{Page |n°=80}} Burke, <u>Political Economy in the 1750-1800 period</u> | ||
Line 4: | Line 23: | ||
1760 | 1760 | ||
{{Page |n°=93}} [Hume – Burke – Rousseau] | […] | ||
<u>Populationism.</u> <u>Quesnay</u> started the question in his talks with Mirabeau the Elder. How and why did it arises at the time? Especially as a large population was unanymously regarded as favorable. | |||
Townsend raised the same question and seems to know only Dampier's voyages. What is the relevance? Malthus took over Townsend's formulation. Was Godwin influenced by Townsend? A large population, on the face of it, would be what the manufacturers need? Why then the spectre of <u>overpopulation</u>? <u>Pitt</u> definitely objected to the panic. It is not clear what the topical aspect of the question was. <u>Burke</u> speaks as is if relative overpopulation were an obvious fact (colonies should take the undesirable population, he suggests). | |||
<div class="hand-written"> | |||
[…] Burke | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=81}} <u>E. Burke</u>: The account of the ______ in America. In Six parts 1760. | |||
I […] | |||
{{Page |n°=86}} <u>E. Burke</u>: <u>Settlements of America 1760</u> | |||
<u>Burke</u>: anything but an economist! | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=87}} <u>Burke E.</u> “ | |||
</div> | |||
=== Thom. <u>Macknight</u>: <u>History of the life of ____ of Edmund Burke</u> | |||
<u>WAGES</u> | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=90}} <u>Burke</u>: Thoughts on scarcity (cont.) | |||
<u>Vol. V</u> […] | |||
{{Page |n°=91}} Notes on <u>Burke</u> | |||
1757 America | |||
E. Burke | |||
{{Page |n°=92}} <u>Power</u> u>Burke</u> | |||
There is a … | |||
{{Page |n°=93}} | |||
[Hume – Burke – Rousseau] | |||
{{Page |n°=94}} <u>Macknights</u>: | |||
{| | |||
| p. 109 | |||
| on Burke's final … | |||
|- | |||
| p. 109 | |||
| = Burke on Montesquieu<br />“The spirit of plans was […] | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| <u>Burke</u>as apol. economist decising | |||
|} | |||
=== Power Political theory === | |||
{{Page |n°=95}} | |||
=== G.D.H. Cole: Pol+Ec ==== | |||
{{Page |n°=96}} <u>Some relations between political and economic Theory</u> | |||
Macmillan, 1934. | |||
During the 19th century theory of politics and of economics […] | |||
(a)<br /> | |||
(b) Early Protectionism à la Friedrich List<br /> | |||
(c) Christian Socialist St. Simon ad the Rhein and Catholics. | |||
(d)<br /> | |||
(e) Marxian Liberal: Fr. Oppenheimer<br /> | |||
(f) Historical school, following Puchta: Schmoller, Knies, Fischer, K. Bücher.<br /> | |||
(g) Utilitarians influenced by Marx (Pickler)<br /> | |||
(h) Conservative Reformers: Vogelsang, | |||
Politics and economics did not … […] | |||
=== Bodin === | |||
<u>Polanyi</u>. Modern's 'formal subjection' |
Revision as of 00:09, 18 May 2019
Title | Karl Polanyi: Notes on readings, 1934-1946 |
Author | Polanyi, Karl |
Description | File consists of Karl Polanyi’s hand-written and annotated typed notes on topics such as pacifism, the fall of Christianity, with references to G. J. Heering, A. Huxley, and G. Heard, among others. The notes are in English. |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10694/529 |
Archive Date | 2010-08-23 |
Contents
[80] Burke, Political Economy in the 1750-1800 period
Burke's economics 1760
[…]
Populationism. Quesnay started the question in his talks with Mirabeau the Elder. How and why did it arises at the time? Especially as a large population was unanymously regarded as favorable.
Townsend raised the same question and seems to know only Dampier's voyages. What is the relevance? Malthus took over Townsend's formulation. Was Godwin influenced by Townsend? A large population, on the face of it, would be what the manufacturers need? Why then the spectre of overpopulation? Pitt definitely objected to the panic. It is not clear what the topical aspect of the question was. Burke speaks as is if relative overpopulation were an obvious fact (colonies should take the undesirable population, he suggests).
[…] Burke
[…]
[81] E. Burke: The account of the ______ in America. In Six parts 1760.
I […]
[86] E. Burke: Settlements of America 1760
Burke: anything but an economist!
[…]
[87] Burke E. “
=== Thom. Macknight: History of the life of ____ of Edmund Burke
WAGES
[…]
[90] Burke: Thoughts on scarcity (cont.)
Vol. V […]
[91] Notes on Burke 1757 America
E. Burke
[92] Power u>Burke
There is a …
[93]
[Hume – Burke – Rousseau]
[94] Macknights:
p. 109 | on Burke's final … |
p. 109 | = Burke on Montesquieu “The spirit of plans was […] |
Burkeas apol. economist decising |
Power Political theory
[95]
G.D.H. Cole: Pol+Ec =
[96] Some relations between political and economic Theory Macmillan, 1934.
During the 19th century theory of politics and of economics […]
(a)
(b) Early Protectionism à la Friedrich List
(c) Christian Socialist St. Simon ad the Rhein and Catholics.
(d)
(e) Marxian Liberal: Fr. Oppenheimer
(f) Historical school, following Puchta: Schmoller, Knies, Fischer, K. Bücher.
(g) Utilitarians influenced by Marx (Pickler)
(h) Conservative Reformers: Vogelsang,
Politics and economics did not … […]
Bodin
Polanyi. Modern's 'formal subjection'