Whither Civilization?: Difference between revisions

From Karl Polanyi
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{English to type}}
{{English to type}}
Co-Existence
 
{{Page |n°=1}} Co-Existence




Line 21: Line 22:
{{Page |n°=6}} contributions: Professor George Gatlin, late of Cornell University, and Professor Hsun-Cheng Shao, of National Tsinghua University, Peiping. […] Adam Smith or of Jeremy Bentham (or of Karl Marx) […]  
{{Page |n°=6}} contributions: Professor George Gatlin, late of Cornell University, and Professor Hsun-Cheng Shao, of National Tsinghua University, Peiping. […] Adam Smith or of Jeremy Bentham (or of Karl Marx) […]  


A galaxy of minds was moving in the same general direction. Novelists, such as A. Huxley, S. Maugham, V. Cronin, depicted the good {{Page |n°=7}} man' of Leibniz's Perennial Philosophy. Writers such as E. Gill, J. Middleton Murry, J. Macmurray, G. Heard or R.M. MacIver developped and deepened the idea of community. Educational psychologists, such as Isaacs, Anderson and Horney; psychoanalysts, such as Suttie,Harding, Ranyard West or Glover; social anthropologists such as Ruth Benedict, Dollard and Malinowski had made important discoveries about man as a co-operative being. Niebuhr's analysis of pride, Russell's diagnosis of power gave substance to the 'remedia approach' broadly followed by Albert Schweitzer, M.K. Gandhi and Aldous Huxley. As a practical matter, Catlin said, a great increase is required in the power of the religion spirit. […]
{{Page |n°=7}} 'veto' should  be dropped in the Security Council. Even though the Russians re overdoing the use … […]
 
A galaxy of minds was moving in the same general direction. Novelists, such as A. Huxley, S. Maugham, V. Cronin, depicted the good {{Page |n°=8}} man' of Leibniz's Perennial Philosophy. Writers such as E. Gill, J. Middleton Murry, J. Macmurray, G. Heard or R.M. MacIver developped and deepened the idea of community. Educational psychologists, such as Isaacs, Anderson and Horney; psychoanalysts, such as Suttie,Harding, Ranyard West or Glover; social anthropologists such as Ruth Benedict, Dollard and Malinowski had made important discoveries about man as a co-operative being. Niebuhr's analysis of pride, Russell's diagnosis of power gave substance to the 'remedia approach' broadly followed by Albert Schweitzer, M.K. Gandhi and Aldous Huxley. As a practical matter, Catlin said, a great increase is required in the power of the religion spirit. […]
 
{{Page |n°=9}} [[File:KPA 14-14, 9.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
 
{{Page |n°=10}} […] Christianity was indifferent to the future of civilization. Donald Maskinnon, of Kable and Balliol Colleges, made it, on the contrary, the crucial test of Christianity, whether it is or is not able to save civilization. He called this religion's 'total engagement in society'.
[[File:KPA 14-14, 10.jpg|thumb|right|600px]]


{{Page |n°=8}} {{Page |n°=9}} {{Page |n°=10}} {{Page |n°=11}} {{Page |n°=12}} {{Page |n°=13}} {{Page |n°=14}} {{Page |n°=15}} {{Page |n°=16}} {{Page |n°=17}}
[[File:KPA 14-14, 9.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 10.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 11.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 11.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
{{Page |n°=11}}
[[File:KPA 14-14, 12.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 12.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
{{Page |n°=12}}
[[File:KPA 14-14, 13.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 13.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
His intellectual nihilism {{Page |n°=13}} was all the more clearly …
{{Page |n°=14}} Professor Lewis Mumford's address was chaired by Sir Alfred Zimmern, late Professor of International Affairs, Oxford University. The problem of our civilization, …
[[File:KPA 14-14, 14.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 14.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 15.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
{{Page |n°=15}} […] Karl Polanyi, of the Oxford Extra-Mural Delegacy, attempted to establish on new foundations man's freedom to shape his own civilization. His address amounted to a rejection of the very concept of economic determinism which would limit this freedom. […]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 16.jpg|thumb|center|800px]]
[[File:KPA 14-14, 15.jpg|thumb|right|500px]]
{{Page |n°=16}} whole society was embedded in the economic system. Secondly, motives for participating in production were reduced to fear of hunger and hope of gain; […] No 'economic determinism' exists under such conditions. For about the Road to Serfdom in a planned economy was proof of an uncritical belief in the validity, in general, of economic determinism. Such a belief is a failure to recognize the peculiar circumstances in which economic determinism was possible, namely, a market-economy. True, much of what we have come to cherish as freedom, was a by-product of market-economy. In future we shall have to plan for some of it. The Bill of Rights will have to be extended into the industrial field, protecting the individual against abuses of the power agglomerated in the bands of governemental or Trade Union authorities. There is no reason for our not having as much freedom in a planned society as we wish to possess. Outside a market-society, it is human nature, not economies, which is determinative.
[[File:KPA 14-14, 16.jpg|thumb|right|500px]]


{{Page |n°=17}} Bowlby Boffered a most instructive account on educational experiments…
[[File:KPA 14-14, 17.jpg|thumb|right|600px]]
== Text Informations ==
== Text Informations ==
'''Reference''':  
'''Reference''':  

Revision as of 00:31, 25 March 2019


Text in English to type

[1] Co-Existence


Articles and editorial
correspondence should be sent to: Dr. RUDOLF SCHLESINGER, Editor Invereoch, Kilmun by Dunoon,
Argylt, Scotland

Karl Polanyi's Text

[2] Although in its quiet way England has staged no less than a social revolution, he would be a courageous man who would say with assurance that any conscious process of thought accompanied it. […] English school of sociology, there is an English method of social action. […] [3]

[4] […] to the problem of an industrial civilization, was not … […] While the Atom Bomb was hardly mentioned, the Jewish-Christian tradition moved into focus.

[5] […] Professor Hodges' contribution … Professor Mumford's sway over the Conference may have been not …

[6] contributions: Professor George Gatlin, late of Cornell University, and Professor Hsun-Cheng Shao, of National Tsinghua University, Peiping. […] Adam Smith or of Jeremy Bentham (or of Karl Marx) […]

[7] 'veto' should be dropped in the Security Council. Even though the Russians re overdoing the use … […]

A galaxy of minds was moving in the same general direction. Novelists, such as A. Huxley, S. Maugham, V. Cronin, depicted the good [8] man' of Leibniz's Perennial Philosophy. Writers such as E. Gill, J. Middleton Murry, J. Macmurray, G. Heard or R.M. MacIver developped and deepened the idea of community. Educational psychologists, such as Isaacs, Anderson and Horney; psychoanalysts, such as Suttie,Harding, Ranyard West or Glover; social anthropologists such as Ruth Benedict, Dollard and Malinowski had made important discoveries about man as a co-operative being. Niebuhr's analysis of pride, Russell's diagnosis of power gave substance to the 'remedia approach' broadly followed by Albert Schweitzer, M.K. Gandhi and Aldous Huxley. As a practical matter, Catlin said, a great increase is required in the power of the religion spirit. […]

[9]

[10] […] Christianity was indifferent to the future of civilization. Donald Maskinnon, of Kable and Balliol Colleges, made it, on the contrary, the crucial test of Christianity, whether it is or is not able to save civilization. He called this religion's 'total engagement in society'.

[11]

[12]

His intellectual nihilism [13] was all the more clearly …

[14] Professor Lewis Mumford's address was chaired by Sir Alfred Zimmern, late Professor of International Affairs, Oxford University. The problem of our civilization, …

[15] […] Karl Polanyi, of the Oxford Extra-Mural Delegacy, attempted to establish on new foundations man's freedom to shape his own civilization. His address amounted to a rejection of the very concept of economic determinism which would limit this freedom. […]

[16] whole society was embedded in the economic system. Secondly, motives for participating in production were reduced to fear of hunger and hope of gain; […] No 'economic determinism' exists under such conditions. For about the Road to Serfdom in a planned economy was proof of an uncritical belief in the validity, in general, of economic determinism. Such a belief is a failure to recognize the peculiar circumstances in which economic determinism was possible, namely, a market-economy. True, much of what we have come to cherish as freedom, was a by-product of market-economy. In future we shall have to plan for some of it. The Bill of Rights will have to be extended into the industrial field, protecting the individual against abuses of the power agglomerated in the bands of governemental or Trade Union authorities. There is no reason for our not having as much freedom in a planned society as we wish to possess. Outside a market-society, it is human nature, not economies, which is determinative.

[17] Bowlby Boffered a most instructive account on educational experiments…

Text Informations

Reference: Document Date: Report of a 1946 Conference of the Institute of Sociology - England, 1946. Published in The Sociological Review, vol. 39, n°2, January 1947, p. 103-112
Archive Date: 1964•1965
KPA: 14/04