Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes XX: Difference between revisions
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
== Text Informations == | == Text Informations == | ||
'''Date''': February 15, 1958 (Interview)<br /> | '''Date''': February 15, 1958 (Interview)<br /> | ||
'''KPA''': 45/16 | '''KPA''': [[45/16]] | ||
== Editor's Notes == | == Editor's Notes == | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 22:35, 8 April 2018
Text in English to type
Comments on my "Not by Organization Alone" Draft #2
Paul Medow and the East
Comments on K.P.'s "A Note" on "Rousseau's
Comments of my letter of Jan. 31, 1958
[13][1] P. liked the letter with the four points and thought all were valid.
In point 1), the second paragraph (moralizing a premature resignation to the r. of s.) is the operative one.
Point 2), is the same thing and gives it content.
Point 3), the formulation should be on the illusion of freedom (which is clearer than ultimate freedom). What do we mean by native freedom? It needs an answer. The continuum of compromise is no answer.
Point 4), certainly there is the freedom of women, children and the working-calss, but it is quite true that they are only freedoms. It is not a satisfactory answer. ↑
"Freedom and Technology" (4)
P. read Hegel (Phenomenology) and half of Lukacs and he could now easily write the Marx.
The real difficulty is then the Shaw. “Back to Methuselah” etc. proves that Shaw was the only thinker who starts from the reality of society and the individual who doesn't feel this limitation is funny.
On existentialism P. doesn't know where to put his foot. He read Camus (also a recent story in Partisan Review) and he is a tremendous writer. ↑
Comments of Adam's Review of Trade and Market
Notes
Arendt
Adler and Keslo Book
Appendix
1984 - A discussion
Excerpt from "Fighting Words", C.B.C. - TV. February 16, 1958
November 2, 1957 ↑
Text Informations
Date: February 15, 1958 (Interview)
KPA: 45/16
Editor's Notes
- ↑ Archive pagination.