55/02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== KPI Description == | == KPI Description == | ||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
| Title | |||
| Correspondence: Ilona Duczynska – George Dalton, 1964-1970 | |||
|- | |||
| Author | |||
| Iiona Duczynska, George Dalton | |||
|- | |||
| Description | |||
| File contains hand-written and typed correspondence between Ilona Duczynska and George Dalton. Some letters are addressed to Ilona Duczynska and Kari Polanyi Levitt. Included in the file is also correspondence with A. Dubuc from Université du Quebec (Canada), Natural History Press, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Francesco Giannini & figli publishers pertaining to the possibility of publishing the monograph Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies. The file also contains copies of letters between professor George Dalton and Hans Zeisel sent to Ilona Duczynska. | |||
|- | |||
| URI | |||
| [http://hdl.handle.net/10694/206 http://hdl.handle.net/10694/206] | |||
|- | |||
| Date | |||
| 1964-1970 | |||
|} | |||
== Contents == | |||
== 4th April, 1965 == | == 4th April, 1965 == | ||
Revision as of 06:57, 8 April 2018
Text in English to type
KPI Description
| Title | Correspondence: Ilona Duczynska – George Dalton, 1964-1970 |
| Author | Iiona Duczynska, George Dalton |
| Description | File contains hand-written and typed correspondence between Ilona Duczynska and George Dalton. Some letters are addressed to Ilona Duczynska and Kari Polanyi Levitt. Included in the file is also correspondence with A. Dubuc from Université du Quebec (Canada), Natural History Press, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Francesco Giannini & figli publishers pertaining to the possibility of publishing the monograph Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies. The file also contains copies of letters between professor George Dalton and Hans Zeisel sent to Ilona Duczynska. |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10694/206 |
| Date | 1964-1970 |
Contents
4th April, 1965
[1] […]
In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.