07/09: Difference between revisions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Or the group of Maitlan, Manus and Guerke, or Brunner, Lamprecht, Below and Dopsch – nut none of which sound Marxist. Excepting of course Marx and Engels one of which as we know did not deny that he was a Marxist. | Or the group of Maitlan, Manus and Guerke, or Brunner, Lamprecht, Below and Dopsch – nut none of which sound Marxist. Excepting of course Marx and Engels one of which as we know did not deny that he was a Marxist. | ||
{{Page |n°=17}} Notes on Thurnwald, ''Die Menschliche Gesellschaft | |||
{{Page |n°=20}} “Polygamy became an advantage...” | |||
Revision as of 00:52, 18 July 2017
KPI Description
Contents
Excerpts
[9] Industrial Revolution [...] Why Marxist? Ashley, Ashdeacon, Cunnigham, Schmoller Levasseur and Toynbee – not one of them sounds Marxian. True there were others like Sombart, Mantoux, Brentano, Hasbach.
(Toynbee founder of the Toynbee Hall)
Or the group of Maitlan, Manus and Guerke, or Brunner, Lamprecht, Below and Dopsch – nut none of which sound Marxist. Excepting of course Marx and Engels one of which as we know did not deny that he was a Marxist.
[17] Notes on Thurnwald, Die Menschliche Gesellschaft
[20] “Polygamy became an advantage...”
[97] Morris Ginsberg: Recent tendencies in sociology
On Max Weber
Alf. Kierkandt
F. Tönnies
L. von Wiese
R. Thurnwald
H. Freyer: Soziologie als Wirklichkeitswissenschaft
K. Mannheim : Wissenschaft 1930 ------> Fr. v. Wieser
Why not ? Sep. Weber