United Nations Organization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{English to type}} | {{English to type}} | ||
== United Nations Organisation == | |||
{{Page |n°=1}} USA<br /> | {{Page |n°=1}} USA<br /> | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
b. <u>The realist factor</u>: […] | b. <u>The realist factor</u>: […] | ||
{{Page |n°=2}} {{Page |n°=3}} {{Page |n°=4}} {{Page |n°=5}} {{Page |n°=6}} | == UNO - problems and prospects == | ||
A. {{Page |n°=2}} | |||
B. {{Page |n°=3}} | |||
C. {{Page |n°=4}} | |||
D. {{Page |n°=5}} | |||
E. | |||
F. {{Page |n°=6}} Now let me return to the British position, and look at ti briefly from the point of view of the American and the Russian thesis | |||
What the Russians call Three Power Co-operation […] | |||
== Text Informations == | == Text Informations == |
Latest revision as of 10:15, 23 March 2019
United Nations Organisation
[1] USA
A. The main forces shaping this new organization were the needs of the Grand Coalition which won the War. The USA could not fully cooperate without some safeguards as to the war aims of the various powers. Yet she herself could not offer any contribution unless she first dropped her isolationism. But American internationalism was, as we saw, necessarily universalist, i.e. directed towards all-inclusive international institutions, like the League of Nations or the Permanent Court of International Justice or more recently the Bretton Woods agreements.
a. Ideological factor: […]
b. The realist factor: […]
USSR
Russia, on the other hand, tended towards Great Power Organization.
a. Ideological factor: […]
b. The realist factor: […]
UNO - problems and prospects
A. [2]
B. [3]
C. [4]
D. [5]
E.
F. [6] Now let me return to the British position, and look at ti briefly from the point of view of the American and the Russian thesis
What the Russians call Three Power Co-operation […]