Notebook XIV: Difference between revisions

From Karl Polanyi
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


<u>The Law of sudden changes</u>
<u>The Law of sudden changes</u>
When is change show : physiological
sudden : mental.
[…]


{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br />
{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br />
The Church has no {busmeis gar}<br />
The Church has no {busmeis gar}<br />
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“<br />
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“<br />
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.<br />
 
Director of the {Union} repudiated {T} and apologized.
[…]


{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br />
{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br />
Line 20: Line 23:
excellent description of Rosenberg.
excellent description of Rosenberg.


Eric Fenn (a […] only too common) was not ____ ____'s writings.
Eric Fenn (a […] only too common) was not know ____'s writings.


Rosenberg's importance […]  
Rosenberg's importance […]  


{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […]
{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the <u>_______</u> <br />
the <u>social</u>izing in the <u>extreme right</u>
 
Volkschule: {right}, I believe not to be called, secundary 
 
<u>Entirely new</u> of that is _____, revolution!<br />
no reports on this appeared in the gen. press — (age?)<br />
Is that correct?
 
{Landgear} :<br />
Reading on Rosenberg's book.


{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>fascism</u><br />
{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>fascism</u><br />
No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;
No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;


Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no „Umbaus“ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!


The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.


Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br />
Mannheim _____ the separation of {Politic} & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br />
<u>Capitalism and Democracy</u><br />
<u>Capitalism and Democracy</u><ref>See [[Wirtschaft und Demokratie]] -- Santiago Pinault</ref><br />
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?


{{Page |n°=8}} The … … <u>fall into the abyss</u>  
{{Page |n°=8}} The {physiological/psychological} {facts} which determines person to <u>undertake a risky _____</u> are entirely different from the ______ experiences during his <u>fall into the abyss</u>.


The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u>causes of the crisis.</u>
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u>causes of the crisis.</u>
Line 43: Line 56:
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.


Umbau ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but <br />
„Umbau“ ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but <br />


principis ______ “Marx's historical law”  
principis ______ “Marx's historical law”  
Line 102: Line 115:
{{Page |n°=35}}
{{Page |n°=35}}
{{Page |n°=36}}
{{Page |n°=36}}
{{Page |n°=37}} The primary religions community is the family  
{{Page |n°=37}} The primary religious community is the family  


<u>Community</u>
<u>Community</u>


</div>
</div>
== Editor's Notes ==
<references />


== Document Informations ==
== Document Informations ==

Revision as of 10:18, 29 November 2019

[3] England, die Völk_____lt
Zwei … […]

The Law of sudden changes When is change show : physiological sudden : mental.

[…]

[4] Kenneth on Jews:
The Church has no {busmeis gar}
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
Director of the {Union} repudiated {T} and apologized.

[5] Eric {Fenn}'s memo:
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitudes) within the Confes. Ch. on the […] structured the Church.

[…]

excellent description of Rosenberg.

Eric Fenn (a […] only too common) was not know ____'s writings.

Rosenberg's importance […]

[6] Class antagonism: but the _______
the socializing in the extreme right

Volkschule: {right}, I believe not to be called, secundary

Entirely new of that is _____, revolution!
no reports on this appeared in the gen. press — (age?)
Is that correct?

{Landgear} :
Reading on Rosenberg's book.

[7] Mannheim on fascism
No {solution/situation} is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;

Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no „Umbaus“ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!

The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.

Mannheim _____ the separation of {Politic} & Economics as artificial. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.
Capitalism and Democracy[1]
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?

[8] The {physiological/psychological} {facts} which determines person to undertake a risky _____ are entirely different from the ______ experiences during his fall into the abyss.

The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the causes of the crisis.

The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.

„Umbau“ ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but

principis ______ “Marx's historical law”

Interdependance is _____ totality cf. partiel (very good)

[9] […] Eckhart […]

[10] … Selbstrationalisierung

Zur kritik Mannheims

[11]

[12]

[13] Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.

Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a definite happening?

[…]

Clearly the will to … […]

But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.

[14] […]

[15] What is meant by the mental character of historical happening {in our} that?

[16] Mannheim's 3 essays …… sudden change […]

Marx was ____ to accept the bulk of the permanent laws ___ (he put …

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21] Sept '35

[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] The primary religious community is the family

Community

Editor's Notes

  1. See Wirtschaft und Demokratie -- Santiago Pinault

Document Informations

Reference:
Date: 1934-1935
KPA: 07/08, 1-52