Notebook XIV: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<u>The Law of sudden changes</u> | <u>The Law of sudden changes</u> | ||
When is change show : physiological | |||
sudden : mental. | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br /> | {{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br /> | ||
The Church has no {busmeis gar}<br /> | The Church has no {busmeis gar}<br /> | ||
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“<br /> | “Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“<br /> | ||
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews. | Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.<br /> | ||
Director of the {Union} repudiated {T} and apologized. | |||
{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br /> | {{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br /> | ||
Line 20: | Line 23: | ||
excellent description of Rosenberg. | excellent description of Rosenberg. | ||
Eric Fenn (a […] only too common) was not | Eric Fenn (a […] only too common) was not know ____'s writings. | ||
Rosenberg's importance […] | Rosenberg's importance […] | ||
{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the | {{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the <u>_______</u> <br /> | ||
the <u>social</u>izing in the <u>extreme right</u> | |||
Volkschule: {right}, I believe not to be called, secundary | |||
<u>Entirely new</u> of that is _____, revolution!<br /> | |||
no reports on this appeared in the gen. press — (age?)<br /> | |||
Is that correct? | |||
{Landgear} :<br /> | |||
Reading on Rosenberg's book. | |||
{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>fascism</u><br /> | {{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>fascism</u><br /> | ||
No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”; | No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”; | ||
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no | Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no „Umbaus“ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake! | ||
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last. | The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last. | ||
Mannheim _____ the separation of | Mannheim _____ the separation of {Politic} & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br /> | ||
<u>Capitalism and Democracy</u><br /> | <u>Capitalism and Democracy</u><ref>See [[Wirtschaft und Demokratie]] -- Santiago Pinault</ref><br /> | ||
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground? | incompatible: on principle or on practical ground? | ||
{{Page |n°=8}} The | {{Page |n°=8}} The {physiological/psychological} {facts} which determines person to <u>undertake a risky _____</u> are entirely different from the ______ experiences during his <u>fall into the abyss</u>. | ||
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u>causes of the crisis.</u> | The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the <u>causes of the crisis.</u> | ||
Line 43: | Line 56: | ||
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis. | The apocalyptic nature of the crisis. | ||
„Umbau“ ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but <br /> | |||
principis ______ “Marx's historical law” | principis ______ “Marx's historical law” | ||
Line 102: | Line 115: | ||
{{Page |n°=35}} | {{Page |n°=35}} | ||
{{Page |n°=36}} | {{Page |n°=36}} | ||
{{Page |n°=37}} The primary | {{Page |n°=37}} The primary religious community is the family | ||
<u>Community</u> | <u>Community</u> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Editor's Notes == | |||
<references /> | |||
== Document Informations == | == Document Informations == |
Revision as of 10:18, 29 November 2019
[3] England, die Völk_____lt
Zwei … […]
The Law of sudden changes When is change show : physiological sudden : mental.
[…]
[4] Kenneth on Jews:
The Church has no {busmeis gar}
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution.“
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
Director of the {Union} repudiated {T} and apologized.
[5] Eric {Fenn}'s memo:
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitudes) within the Confes. Ch. on the […] structured the Church.
[…]
excellent description of Rosenberg.
Eric Fenn (a […] only too common) was not know ____'s writings.
Rosenberg's importance […]
[6] Class antagonism: but the _______
the socializing in the extreme right
Volkschule: {right}, I believe not to be called, secundary
Entirely new of that is _____, revolution!
no reports on this appeared in the gen. press — (age?)
Is that correct?
{Landgear} :
Reading on Rosenberg's book.
[7] Mannheim on fascism
No {solution/situation} is defined not of which of _____. It is not regarded as a solution for a ____ ”problem”;
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no „Umbaus“ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
Mannheim _____ the separation of {Politic} & Economics as artificial. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.
Capitalism and Democracy[1]
incompatible: on principle or on practical ground?
[8] The {physiological/psychological} {facts} which determines person to undertake a risky _____ are entirely different from the ______ experiences during his fall into the abyss.
The psychology change a crisis is not the psychology of the causes of the crisis.
The apocalyptic nature of the crisis.
„Umbau“ ______ a great piece of truth (not: _____); but
principis ______ “Marx's historical law”
Interdependance is _____ totality cf. partiel (very good)
[9] […] Eckhart […]
[10] … Selbstrationalisierung
Zur kritik Mannheims
[11]
[12]
[13] Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.
Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a definite happening?
[…]
Clearly the will to … […]
But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.
[14] […]
[15] What is meant by the mental character of historical happening {in our} that?
[16] Mannheim's 3 essays …… sudden change […]
Marx was ____ to accept the bulk of the permanent laws ___ (he put …
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21] Sept '35
[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] The primary religious community is the family
Community
Editor's Notes
- ↑ See Wirtschaft und Demokratie -- Santiago Pinault