22/03: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="font-family:Garamond;"> | <div style="font-family:Garamond;"> | ||
{{Page |n°=104}} Ch. 1 Confusion of Economics + Market form<br /> | {{Page |n°=104}} Ch. 1 Confusion of Economics + Market form<br /> | ||
Ch. 2 How did this afford the other disphnos ?< | <span style="margin-left:33px">Ch. 2 How did this afford the other disphnos ?</span> | ||
Economic approach x (exchange)<br /> | <u>I. Economic theory</u>: I’ll gave a phases to economic theory<br /> | ||
The distribution of the material dilemma<br /> | <span style="margin-left:112px">Economic approach x (exchange)<br /></span> | ||
Market + its laws<br /> | <span style="margin-left:112px">The distribution of the material dilemma<br /></span> | ||
A theory of price<br /> | <span style="margin-left:112px">Market + its laws<br /></span> | ||
Limitations<span style="margin-left: | <span style="margin-left:112px">A theory of price<br /></span> | ||
Theories of cabes lacking | Limitations<span style="margin-left:45px"><u>An equilibrium + a scarcity theory</u><br /> | ||
<span style="margin-left:112px">Theories of cabes lacking</span> | |||
M. Weber: Categories<span style="margin-left: | M. Weber: Categories<br /> | ||
Bowling : quotes<span style="margin-left:20px">very effective but œnived from current meanings | |||
Catallactic triad<span style="margin-left:25px">trade xxxx<br /> | |||
<span style="margin-left:110px">absorbed by the market: constitution of monopolies of supply and for the use of xxxxxx social sciences | |||
A theory [that] became the wrong theory to give a lead for the xxxxxx of the xx of the e. ver torie.<br /> | A theory [that] became the wrong theory to give a lead for the xxxxxx of the xx of the e. ver torie.<br /> | ||
II. Economic history<br /> | |||
<u>II. Economic history</u><br /> | |||
Classical beginnings preceder. Ec. Theory. Still immense : (Boeche compare with Andreades (mirror of a century later)<br /> | Classical beginnings preceder. Ec. Theory. Still immense : (Boeche compare with Andreades (mirror of a century later)<br /> | ||
A faithful xxxx of L.MN fashions of the 1920’s.<br /> | A faithful xxxx of L.MN fashions of the 1920’s.<br /> | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 3 August 2017
[104] Ch. 1 Confusion of Economics + Market form
Ch. 2 How did this afford the other disphnos ?
I. Economic theory: I’ll gave a phases to economic theory
Economic approach x (exchange)
The distribution of the material dilemma
Market + its laws
A theory of price
LimitationsAn equilibrium + a scarcity theory
Theories of cabes lacking
M. Weber: Categories
Bowling : quotesvery effective but œnived from current meanings
Catallactic triadtrade xxxx
absorbed by the market: constitution of monopolies of supply and for the use of xxxxxx social sciences
A theory [that] became the wrong theory to give a lead for the xxxxxx of the xx of the e. ver torie.
II. Economic history
Classical beginnings preceder. Ec. Theory. Still immense : (Boeche compare with Andreades (mirror of a century later)
A faithful xxxx of L.MN fashions of the 1920’s.
Stages theories : Hildebrand, Plenge, Salin, Meichellkein: Spieth of Laune : marxism
Nuscham theory: Bendiscen: Knapp. Mistle n inis. Petri Was. Oniggin.
Market theory: Rostovtzeff.
[105]
1940 The {amateur} social philosophers {strongpling} in {Hamster} of the host and {contributing} in very {siffvent} {desidary} to the stream
Drucker,
{Polanyis}
Popper
{Bosherman}
Koestler
Hayek
{Srilard/Szilard}
[106] Ch. 2 (continued)
economic history (continued)
οικος controversy: Rodbertus {tadled} the taxation system of Rome in a reality way as that of non-market economy.
[111] Polanyi rewrites plan for chapter II and quotes the catallactics.