22/03: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Anthropologie économique, préparation de The Livelihood of Man) Tentative de transcription de la p. 104 : [p.104] Ch. 1 Confusion of Economics + Market form Ch. 2 How did...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="font-family:Garamond;"> | |||
{{Page |n°=104}} Ch. 1 Confusion of Economics + Market form<br /> | |||
Ch. 2 How did this afford the other disphnos ?<br /> | |||
Ch. 2 How did this afford the other disphnos ? | |||
I. Economic theory: I’ll gave a phases to economic theory | I. Economic theory: I’ll gave a phases to economic theory | ||
Economic approach x (exchange) | Economic approach x (exchange)<br /> | ||
The distribution of the material dilemma | The distribution of the material dilemma<br /> | ||
Market + its laws | Market + its laws<br /> | ||
A theory of price | A theory of price<br /> | ||
Limitations | Limitations<span style="margin-left:15px">An equilibrium + a scarcity theory<br /> | ||
Theories of cabes lacking | Theories of cabes lacking | ||
M. Weber: Categories | M. Weber: Categories<span style="margin-left:15px">very effective but</span><br /> | ||
Bowling : quotes | Bowling : quotes<span style="margin-left:42px">œnived from current meanings | ||
Catallactic triad | Catallactic triad<span style="margin-left:25px">trade xxxx absorbed by the market: constitution of monopolies of supply and for the use of xxxxxx</span> | ||
social sciences | social sciences<br /> | ||
A theory [that] became the wrong theory to give a lead for the xxxxxx of the xx of the e. ver torie. | A theory [that] became the wrong theory to give a lead for the xxxxxx of the xx of the e. ver torie.<br /> | ||
II. Economic history | II. Economic history<br /> | ||
Classical beginnings preceder. Ec. Theory. Still immense : (Boeche compare with Andreades (mirror of a century later) | Classical beginnings preceder. Ec. Theory. Still immense : (Boeche compare with Andreades (mirror of a century later)<br /> | ||
A faithful xxxx of L.MN fashions of the 1920’s. | A faithful xxxx of L.MN fashions of the 1920’s.<br /> | ||
Stages theories : Hildebrand, Plenge, Salin, Meichellkein: Spieth of Laune : marxism | Stages theories : Hildebrand, Plenge, Salin, Meichellkein: Spieth of Laune : marxism<br /> | ||
Nuscham theory: Bendiscen: Knapp. Mistle n inis. Petri Was. Oniggin. | Nuscham theory: Bendiscen: Knapp. Mistle n inis. Petri Was. Oniggin.<br /> | ||
Market theory: Rostovtzeff. | Market theory: Rostovtzeff. | ||
{{Page |n°=105}} | |||
1940 The amateur | <u>1940</u> The {amateur} social philosophers {strongpling} in {Hamster} of the host and {contributing} in very {siffvent} {desidary} to the stream<br /> | ||
Drucker, Polanyis<br /> | <span style="margin-left:25px;">Drucker,</span><br /> | ||
Popper<br /> | <span style="margin-left:25px;">{Polanyis}<br /></span> | ||
Bosherman<br /> | <span style="margin-left:25px;">Popper<br /></span> | ||
<span style="margin-left:25px;">{Bosherman}<br /></span> | |||
Hayek<br /> | <span style="margin-left:25px;">Koestler<br /></span> | ||
Srilard< | <span style="margin-left:25px;">Hayek<br /></span> | ||
<span style="margin-left:25px;">{Srilard/Szilard}</span> | |||
( | {{Page |n°=106}} Ch. 2 (continued)<br /> | ||
economic history (continued) <br /> | |||
οικος controversy: Rodbertus {tadled} the taxation system of Rome in a reality way as that of <u>non-market</u> economy. | |||
{{Page |n°=111}} Polanyi rewrites plan for chapter II and quotes the catallactics. | |||
</div> |
Revision as of 22:15, 3 August 2017
[104] Ch. 1 Confusion of Economics + Market form
Ch. 2 How did this afford the other disphnos ?
I. Economic theory: I’ll gave a phases to economic theory
Economic approach x (exchange)
The distribution of the material dilemma
Market + its laws
A theory of price
LimitationsAn equilibrium + a scarcity theory
Theories of cabes lacking
M. Weber: Categoriesvery effective but
Bowling : quotesœnived from current meanings
Catallactic triadtrade xxxx absorbed by the market: constitution of monopolies of supply and for the use of xxxxxx
social sciences
A theory [that] became the wrong theory to give a lead for the xxxxxx of the xx of the e. ver torie.
II. Economic history
Classical beginnings preceder. Ec. Theory. Still immense : (Boeche compare with Andreades (mirror of a century later)
A faithful xxxx of L.MN fashions of the 1920’s.
Stages theories : Hildebrand, Plenge, Salin, Meichellkein: Spieth of Laune : marxism
Nuscham theory: Bendiscen: Knapp. Mistle n inis. Petri Was. Oniggin.
Market theory: Rostovtzeff.
[105]
1940 The {amateur} social philosophers {strongpling} in {Hamster} of the host and {contributing} in very {siffvent} {desidary} to the stream
Drucker,
{Polanyis}
Popper
{Bosherman}
Koestler
Hayek
{Srilard/Szilard}
[106] Ch. 2 (continued)
economic history (continued)
οικος controversy: Rodbertus {tadled} the taxation system of Rome in a reality way as that of non-market economy.
[111] Polanyi rewrites plan for chapter II and quotes the catallactics.