|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| == Table of Contents == | | == Table of Contents == |
| * [[Notebook XIV]] | | * [[Notebook XIV]] [1934-1935], 1-52 |
| * [[Notebook XV]] | | * [[Notebook XV]] [1935], 53-156 |
| * [[Notebook XVI]] | | * [[Notebook XVI]] [1919-1922], 157-184 |
| * [[Notebook I]], 185-254 | | * [[Notebook I]] [1919-1922], 185-254 |
| | |
| == Notebook XIV [1935] ==
| |
| | |
| <div style="font-family:Garamond;">
| |
| {{Page |n°=3}} England, die Völk_____lt<br />
| |
| Zwei … […]
| |
| | |
| <u>The Law of sudden changes</u>
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br /
| |
| The Church has no …
| |
| | |
| “Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution“<br />
| |
| Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br />
| |
| As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitud<u>es</u>) <u>within</u> the Confes. Ch. on {Thc}
| |
| […]
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […]
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>_______</u><br />
| |
| No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined …
| |
| | |
| Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
| |
| | |
| The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
| |
| | |
| Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br />
| |
| <u>Capitalism and _______cy</u>
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung
| |
| | |
| <u>Zur kritik Mannheims</u>
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.
| |
| | |
| Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a <u>definite happening</u>?
| |
| | |
| […]
| |
| | |
| But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=15}} What is meant by the <u>mental</u> character of historical happening {in our} that?
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=16}} Mannheim's 3 essays …… <u>sudden change</u>
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=21}} Sept '35
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=37}} The primary religions community is the family
| |
| | |
| <u>Community</u>
| |
| | |
| </div>
| |
| | |
| == Notebook XV [1935] ==
| |
| <div style="font-family:Garamond;">
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=68}} Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=80}} à la Hegel +
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=81}} […] Hegel refuses to accept the …
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=87}} a relationship of persons.
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=91}} revealed to us in Jesus Christ. Only if economics bear any reference to this its achieve issue can we be concerned with it as Xtians.
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=99}} Bryce: ''The American Commonwealth''
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=131}} Thorstein Veblen: The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) New York Vanguard Press 1927
| |
| | |
| {{Page |n°=154}} Things to check:<br />
| |
| <u>Bergson</u>:
| |
| </div>
| |
| == Notebook XVI [1935] ==
| |
| <div style="font-family:Garamond;">
| |
| {{Page |n°=157}} Physiokratic
| |
| </div>
| |