07/08: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Notebook XIV [1935] == | == Notebook XIV [1935] == | ||
<div style="font-family:Garamond;"> | <div style="font-family:Garamond;"> | ||
{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br / | {{Page |n°=3}} England, die Völk_____lt<br /> | ||
Zwei … […] | |||
<u>The Law of sudden changes</u> | |||
{{Page |n°=4}} Kenneth on Jews:<br / | |||
The Church has no … | The Church has no … | ||
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution“<br /> | |||
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews. | |||
{{Page |n°=5}} <u>Eric {Fenn}</u>'s memo:<br /> | |||
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitud<u>es</u>) <u>within</u> the Confes. Ch. on {Thc} | |||
[…] | |||
{{Page |n°=6}} Class antagonism: but the […] | |||
{{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>_______</u><br /> | {{Page |n°=7}} Mannheim on <u>_______</u><br /> | ||
No <u>solution</u> is defined … | No <u>{solution/situation}</u> is defined … | ||
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake! | |||
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last. | |||
Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as <u>artificial</u>. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.<br /> | |||
<u>Capitalism and _______cy</u> | |||
{{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung | {{Page |n°=10}} … Selbstrationalisierung | ||
| Line 39: | Line 59: | ||
{{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics. | {{Page |n°=13}} Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics. | ||
Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the … | Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a <u>definite happening</u>? | ||
[…] | |||
But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”. | |||
{{Page |n°=15}} What is meant by the <u>mental</u> character of historical happening {in our} that? | |||
{{Page |n°=16}} Mannheim's 3 essays …… <u>sudden change</u> | |||
{{Page |n°=21}} Sept '35 | {{Page |n°=21}} Sept '35 | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 6 August 2017
KPI Description
| Title | Karl Polanyi: Notes on readings, 1934-1946 |
| Author | Polanyi, Karl |
| Description | File consists of hand-written notes on readings in English, French and German, taken during Karl Polanyi’s stay in England. |
| URI | http://hdl.handle.net/10694/1040 |
| Date | 2013-02-20 |
Table of Contents
- Notebook XIV
- Notebook XV
- Notebook XVI
- Notebook I, 185-254
Notebook XIV [1935]
[3] England, die Völk_____lt
Zwei … […]
The Law of sudden changes
[4] Kenneth on Jews:<br / The Church has no …
“Church to take public ____ even about so scandalous a thing as Jewish persecution“
Berlin ________: Dr {Dannenbaum} _____ a defence of Jews.
[5] Eric {Fenn}'s memo:
As to the Jewish question. E.F. leaves an important point in the dark: the attitude (or rather: attitudes) within the Confes. Ch. on {Thc}
[…]
[6] Class antagonism: but the […]
[7] Mannheim on _______
No {solution/situation} is defined …
Behaviorism + central _______ therefore: no change in the human being, no ______ attempted the chaos ____ underneath. A bad mistake!
The opposite = true: Frei_____ to solve the problem with the help of a change in the individual − which however will not last.
Mannheim _____ the separation of _____ & Economics as artificial. This implies _____ criticism of any theory.
Capitalism and _______cy
[10] … Selbstrationalisierung
Zur kritik Mannheims
[13] Max Weber „chance” is the sociological adequate for probability a an ultimate determinant in atomistic physics.
Mannheim investigates into probabilities? But what are the _______ “classical mechanics”? − This is the question. Method of answering it: each „chance“ to be regarded makes this aspect: what is the necessity of its becoming a chance for a definite happening?
[…]
But life ____ may mean different things − especially „good life”.
[15] What is meant by the mental character of historical happening {in our} that?
[16] Mannheim's 3 essays …… sudden change
[21] Sept '35
[37] The primary religions community is the family
Community
Notebook XV [1935]
[68] Theory of fascist Transformation (cont)
[80] à la Hegel +
[81] […] Hegel refuses to accept the …
[87] a relationship of persons.
[91] revealed to us in Jesus Christ. Only if economics bear any reference to this its achieve issue can we be concerned with it as Xtians.
[99] Bryce: The American Commonwealth
[131] Thorstein Veblen: The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) New York Vanguard Press 1927
[154] Things to check:
Bergson:
Notebook XVI [1935]
[157] Physiokratic