Trotsky's Position - Revision history

Santiago Pinault: Santiago Pinault moved page Trotzky's Position to Trotsky's Position

2020-06-23T02:19:18Z

Santiago Pinault moved page Trotzky's Position to Trotsky's Position

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:19, 23 June 2020
(No difference)

Santiago Pinault at 14:13, 29 April 2020

2020-04-29T14:13:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 29 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg\|600px\|right]]		[[File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg\|600px\|right]]
	{{Page \|n°=4}} Neither Trotzky nor his opponents provide us with a full statement of the facts of the Trotzkyite crisis. Trotzky's method implies secrecy of his actual plans and even of his programme, mainly on account of this, his opponents refuse to accept Trotzkysm as a tendency in the working class movement. ~~[…] {{English~~ to ~~type}}~~		{{Page \|n°=4}} Neither Trotzky nor his opponents provide us with a full statement of the facts of the Trotzkyite crisis. Trotzky's method implies secrecy of his actual plans and even of his programme, mainly on account of this, his opponents refuse to accept Trotzkysm as a tendency in the working class movement. The communists disdain to conceal their ideals and aims - says the Communists Manifesto.

	Trotzky claims to base his policy on the world revolution which he expects as the result of world war. The activities of the P.O.U.M. in Spain; the sabotage of economic construction in the U.S.S.R.; ~~[…]~~		Trotzky claims to base his policy on the world revolution which he expects as the result of world war. The activities of the P.O.U.M. in Spain; the sabotage of economic construction in the U.S.S.R.; the bargaining with Fascist powers - Germany and Japan -for the partition of the U.S.S.R. and for the accomplishment of a "retreat" from the advanced socialist position in it are parts of this policy. In this Trotsky is not inconsistent; indeed his theory of the "permanent revolution" almost constrains him to follow such q line under the given circumstances. But this theory itself has been proved for it implied he dogmatic assumptions: a) hat socialism could not be established in the U.S.S.R.; b) that in capitalist countries today war or civil war must result in the victory of the socialist revolution. The first supposition was refuted by the success of the Five Year Plans including collectivisation; the second by the success of Fascism in a number of leading countries.

	By ignoring these two facts Trotzky can uphold his theory of the permanent revolution and deny 1) that the working class has built in the U.S.S.R. something worth defending; 2) that Fascism is a new development which the working class movement has to face.		By ignoring these two facts Trotzky can uphold his theory of the permanent revolution and deny 1) that the working class has built in the U.S.S.R. something worth defending; 2) that Fascism is a new development which the working class movement has to face.

Santiago Pinault at 23:22, 2 April 2020

2020-04-02T23:22:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 3 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{English to type}}~~		[[File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg\|600px\|right]]
	{{Page \|n°=4}}		{{Page \|n°=4}} Neither Trotzky nor his opponents provide us with a full statement of the facts of the Trotzkyite crisis. Trotzky's method implies secrecy of his actual plans and even of his programme, mainly on account of this, his opponents refuse to accept Trotzkysm as a tendency in the working class movement. […] {{English to type}}

	[[~~File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg]~~]		Trotzky claims to base his policy on the world revolution which he expects as the result of world war. The activities of the P.O.U.M. in Spain; the sabotage of economic construction in the U.S.S.R.; […]
	{{Page \|n°=5}}
	[[File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg]]		By ignoring these two facts Trotzky can uphold his theory of the permanent revolution and deny 1) that the working class has built in the U.S.S.R. something worth defending; 2) that Fascism is a new development which the working class movement has to face.

			The theory of the permanent revolution implied “that backward Russia would begin the socialist revolution … […]


			{{Page \|n°=5}} the time) but that he adhered to them in a dogmatic fashion in a situation in which new decisions had become inevitable.

			Up to the time of Lenin's death nobody in the Bolshevik Party believed that Socialism could be established in Russia alone and world revolution was an essential part of the Bolshevik perspective. But after Lenin's death the economic "retreat" represented by the NEP** began to become unworkable. It was never meant to be permanent; the world revolution, it was hoped, would have Russia from her isolation before economic collapse forced her to capitulate to the Kulak's counter revolution. But the world revolution did not come and the pressing needs of the towns and of the socialist sector of industry compelled the Soviet Government to interfere with the peasant households to a degree that was whether a new interim programme
			[[File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg\|600px\|right]]

	== Document Informations ==		== Document Informations ==
	'''Reference''':<br />		'''Reference''':<br />
	'''Publication''': Summary of discussions and a Draft Statement by a Christian Left Group, December ~~4th~~ and ~~5th~~ and May, [[1938]].<br />		'''Publication''': Summary of discussions and a Draft Statement by a Christian Left Group, December 4<sup>th</sup> and 5<sup>th</sup> and May, [[1938]].<br />
	'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5		'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5

Santiago Pinault at 19:55, 10 December 2019

2019-12-10T19:55:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 10 December 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{English to type}}		{{English to type}}
			{{Page \|n°=4}}

	[[File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg]]		[[File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg]]
			{{Page \|n°=5}}
	[[File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg]]		[[File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg]]

Santiago Pinault: /* Document Informations */

2019-04-12T22:52:39Z

Document Informations

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 12 April 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Document Informations ==		== Document Informations ==
	'''Reference''':<br />		'''Reference''':<br />
	'''Publication''': Summary of discussions and a Draft Statement by a Christian Left Group~~.<br />~~		'''Publication''': Summary of discussions and a Draft Statement by a Christian Left Group, December 4th and 5th and May, [[1938]].<br />
	~~'''Date''':~~ December 4th and 5th and May, [[1938]].<br />
	'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5		'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5

Santiago Pinault at 00:36, 23 March 2019

2019-03-23T00:36:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 23 March 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Document Informations ==		== Document Informations ==
	'''Reference''':<br />		'''Reference''':<br />
	'''Draft''': <br />		'''Publication''': Summary of discussions and a Draft Statement by a Christian Left Group.<br />
			'''Date''': December 4th and 5th and May, [[1938]].<br />
	'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5		'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5

Santiago Pinault: Created page with "{{English to type}} File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg == Document Informations == '''Reference''':
'''Draft''':
'''KPA''': 20/11, 4-5"

2019-03-23T00:20:16Z

Created page with "{{English to type}} File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg == Document Informations == '''Reference''':<br /> '''Draft''': <br /> '''KPA''': 20/11, 4-5"

New page

{{English to type}}

[[File:KPA 20-11, 4.jpg]]
[[File:KPA 20-11, 5.jpg]]

== Document Informations ==
'''Reference''':<br />
'''Draft''': <br />
'''KPA''': [[20/11]], 4-5