Notebook XV - Revision history

Santiago Pinault: /* Charles of Beard */

2021-05-10T00:29:58Z

Charles of Beard

@@ Line 489: / Line 489: @@
 {{Page |n°=149}} {Ponizhom}: biocentric theory of community
-{{Page |n°=153}} Rosenberg
+{{Page |n°=150}}
 {{Page |n°=154}} Things to check:<br />
-<u>Bergson</u>:
+<u>Bergson</u>: _____ Klages.
-{{Page |n°=154}} … on Spann's <u>personal relationship</u>
+{{Page |n°=154}} Helving on Spann's <u>personal relationship</u> … […]
 </div>

Santiago Pinault: /* Charles of Beard */

2021-05-10T00:21:06Z

Charles of Beard

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 10 May 2021
Line 438:		Line 438:
	{{Page \|n°=142}}		{{Page \|n°=142}}

	{{Page \|n°=143}}		{{Page \|n°=143}} The <u>actual</u> effort of the Fascist movement is to<br />
			1) destroy the influence of the working class, both in the political industrial sphere

	{{Page \|n°=144}}		2) keep the property system intact (an active … […]

			<u>Corporative State</u>

			The fascist State. ____ of the actual changes.

			The ”movement” … […]

			{{Page \|n°=144}} programme discarded.
			[…]

			… <u>revolutionary</u>; suppression _____ systematicity totalitarian character developed; <u>elaboration, philosophic implications become cleaves</u>; opposite of a <u>transition</u> idea = <u>finalism</u> developing; ____ against fascist <u>integration</u> […]

	{{Page \|n°=145}}		{{Page \|n°=145}}

	{{Page \|n°=146}}		{{Page \|n°=146}} 1. Xty is concerned with the relationship of man to God.

			2. The relationship of man to God is the relationship of mankind to God.

			3. The relationship of man = ___ to God depends upon the actual state of mankind, which is nothing but the relationship of man to man.

			The individual

	{{Page \|n°=147}} […]		{{Page \|n°=147}} […]

Santiago Pinault: /* Charles of Beard */

2021-05-10T00:08:32Z

Charles of Beard

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 10 May 2021
Line 411:		Line 411:

	{{Page \|n°=131}} Thorstein <u>Veblen</u>: The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) New York Vanguard Press 1927		{{Page \|n°=131}} Thorstein <u>Veblen</u>: The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) New York Vanguard Press 1927

			“organic remnant” placed in pro-anthrop___ society, which is supposed to have then ______: goodwill, equity, _______ […]

	{{Page \|n°=132}} […]		{{Page \|n°=132}} […]

Santiago Pinault: /* Theory of the Facist Transformation (cont.) (4) */

2021-05-10T00:03:54Z

Theory of the Facist Transformation (cont.) (4)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 10 May 2021
Line 276:		Line 276:
	D. Roosevelt		D. Roosevelt

	<u>Auflösung d. faschistische […]		<u>Auflösung d. faschistische</u> […]

	{{Page \|n°=105}} <u>Copec: Vol. N.</u> 16 {April} '35<br />		{{Page \|n°=105}} <u>Copec: Vol. N.</u> 16 {April} '35<br />

Santiago Pinault: /* English society */

2021-05-10T00:03:01Z

English society

Show changes

Santiago Pinault: /* Theory of the Facist Transformation (continued) */

2021-05-09T20:43:07Z

Theory of the Facist Transformation (continued)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 9 May 2021
Line 49:		Line 49:
	„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145		„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145

	== Theory of the Facist Transformation (~~continued~~) ==		== Theory of the Facist Transformation (cont.) ==

	{{Page \|n°=74}} ~~<u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)<br />~~		{{Page \|n°=74}} The influence of the working class a <u>{nuisance} value</u>.

	The influence of the working class a <u>{nuisance} value</u>.

	Positive _____<br />		Positive _____<br />
Line 59:		Line 57:
	b)<br >		b)<br >
	c)<br >		c)<br >
	d)<br >		d) reforming capitalism of factory <br >

	<u>more ______</u>		<u>more ______</u>
Line 73:		Line 71:
	[…]		[…]

	{{Page \|n°=76}} […] war theological.		{{Page \|n°=76}} […] <u>Karl Marx war theological</u>.

	„Kleanthes” Dialog von 24 B____ eine philosophische-dialektische __________ __ Gottheit…“		„Kleanthes” Dialog von 24 B____ eine philosophische-dialektische __________ __ Gottheit…“
Line 79:		Line 77:
	His _____ ___ ____ theological _______ law, theology, etc.		His _____ ___ ____ theological _______ law, theology, etc.

	Hegel […].		Hegel {lapt} die Stände […].

	{{Page \|n°=77}} <u>Marx on the „Corporative State”</u>		{{Page \|n°=77}} <u>Marx on the „Corporative State”</u>
Line 85:		Line 83:
	There is a Criticism of Marx in the Corporative State which is of very real interest.		There is a Criticism of Marx in the Corporative State which is of very real interest.

	It was a _______. We are faced by a ____ view. Fascism […] Hegel …		It was a _______. We are faced by a ____ view. Fascism […] to the stage at which Hegel ____ to fix them in the 1820s.

	Capitalism was coming, now it is outgoing. But we do not overate …		Capitalism was coming, now it is outgoing. But we do not overate to-day their phases. Capitalism was centuries old, and certainly … […]

	Hegel gave an …		Hegel gave an idealized version of the Prussian State of his time.

			We do not say that {France} is nothing else but absolutism.

	{{Page \|n°=78}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)		{{Page \|n°=78}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)
Line 114:		Line 114:
	b) […]		b) […]

	{{Page \|n°=80}} à la Hegel + a ~~{materialisation}~~ of the Corporations and States of the Realm. But these are certainly, very close analyses.		{{Page \|n°=80}} à la Hegel + a modernisation of the Corporations and States of the Realm. But these are certainly, very close analyses.

	It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command.		It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command.
Line 121:		Line 121:
	political sphere - economic sphere		political sphere - economic sphere

	1) Hegel refuses to accept the individual as the ~~wih~~ of the political State.		1) Hegel refuses to accept the individual as the with of the political State.

	He prefers the <u>~~{facial/fascists}~~</u> and <u>economic life</u> the later as _________ corporations.		He prefers the <u>family</u> and <u>economic life</u> the later as _________ corporations. \| Hitlerism insists of family!

	The State emerges out of the family and economic life […] of nature out of which the ____ of the State leaps (23)		The State emerges out of the family and economic life […] of nature out of which the ____ of the State leaps (23)
Line 130:		Line 130:

	Two ______ of balance: […]		Two ______ of balance: […]
			a) political system must be sufficiently workable (extreme cases! […]

	~~{{Page \|n°=83}} When Hegel [~~…]		a) England …

	First: What does Hegel say: family and economic life are stated to be ~~that~~ […]		b) Germany …

			c) Italy: …

			d) Austria …

			e) Poland: … […]

			{{Page \|n°=83}} When Hegel in his curious phenomenology makes the family and the economic life are the two […]

			First: What does Hegel say: family and economic life are stated to be the two ”____ into which the real … […]

	What about the {individualized}		What about the {individualized}
Line 143:		Line 154:
	<u>I In search of a starting point</u>		<u>I In search of a starting point</u>

	Christianity is ~~… […]~~		Christianity is not ____ with economics. The idea of E., as a {separated to depart.} of human life, _____ by its own laws s.c. economics laws, is a <u>recent</u> development and entirely un-Christian.

			However, economic question are __ path of a group of social problems. explains the ____ th think up economics with Xty by the way of the social problems.

			a) This is futiles effort for Christianity bear no reference to social problems as such. It is concerned with the relation of man to God as

	{{Page \|n°=86}} <u>~~English society~~</u>		== English society ==
			{{Page \|n°=86}} English <u></u>

	[…]		[…]

Santiago Pinault at 20:13, 9 May 2021

2021-05-09T20:13:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 9 May 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	demonic abyss.		demonic abyss.

	<u>True/u> is every day & secular…		<u>True</u> is every day & secular…

	„One who does not recognize that fact and who, mistaken, holding to the belief ___.		„One who does not recognize that fact and who, mistaken, holding to the belief ___.
Line 49:		Line 49:
	„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145		„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145

	== ==		== Theory of the Facist Transformation (continued) ==

	{{Page \|n°=74}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)<br />		{{Page \|n°=74}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)<br />

Santiago Pinault: in

2019-11-30T11:04:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 30 November 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	{{Page \|n°=69}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)		{{Page \|n°=69}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)

			== Notes of readings on Tillich? ==
	{{Page \|n°=70}} Tillich (13)<br />		{{Page \|n°=70}} Tillich (13)<br />
	the _____ about the {dunie}<br />		the _____ about the {dunie}<br />
	possibility is a human possibility		possibility {is/in} a human possibility

	~~[…]~~		”Were an event only a foreign substance in History it come ______ be absorbed by history nor and it continent to be operative in history! 138<br />
			the „____ of time”:<br />
			_____________: ___ rise out of history<br />
			Spernaturalism: foreign injection into history 138

			„Bank does not recognize the value of ____ ________ about ____”, of religion ______ ______…

	{{Page \|n°=71}} ~~a that~~ is this human entity? Can it be thought of only is something without the divine without the capacity for receiving answers from the divine and for ~~… […]~~		{{Page \|n°=71}} What is this human entity? Can it be thought of only is something without the divine without the capacity for receiving answers from the divine and for ______ ga_____ of the divine?” 139

	Certainly _____ is not revelation (is a human possibility, while revelation is impossibility (divine possibility). Yet revelation ____ not be even a divine <u>~~possiblity~~</u> -- revelation is indeed revelation to man - if it _____ not be received by means of {Yorus} of _____ as human phenomena” (140)		Certainly _____ is not revelation (is a human possibility, while revelation is impossibility (divine possibility). Yet revelation ____ not be even a divine <u>possibility</u> -- revelation is indeed revelation to man - if it _____ not be received by means of {Yorus} of _____ as human phenomena” (140)

	Theology is not anthropology (heads to _________ and ______)		Theology is not anthropology (heads to _________ and ______)

	{{Page \|n°=72}} ~~[…]~~		{{Page \|n°=72}} „Hebelier's is a fortress _______ of human action ravaged of sin and without ____ to the divine or to the demonic” His _____ leaching on point.
			Refuses to ________ <u>theological ethics</u>.

			Tolley: It is an _______ of existence without reference to both divine & human _________.

			We live in three dimensions:<br />
			1) <br />
			2) form ______ it<br />
			3) third dimension: divine mountain top<br />
			demonic abyss.

			<u>True/u> is every day & secular…

			„One who does not recognize that fact and who, mistaken, holding to the belief ___.

			{{Page \|n°=73}} two dimensional reality renounces the religions conflict against physical, social and spiritual demonic forces, in _____ journal of economics interests.

			In this respect the battle on {theology} is _________ in ____ of guilty.” 144

			Liberal theology, through its belief in <u>progress</u>, has been guilty as of obscuring the demonic.

	~~Refuses to ________ <u>theological ethics</u>.~~		{Barth}: _______ of human activities from both divine and demonic progress…

			„Both deny the realism of dialectic, that is three-dimensional, thinking.” 145

			== ==

	{{Page \|n°=73}} ~~two~~ of ~~____________ reality renounces the religions ______ against physical, social and spiritual demonic forces, […]~~		{{Page \|n°=74}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)<br />

	~~{{Page \|n°=74}}~~ The influence of the working class a <u>{nuisance} value</u>.		The influence of the working class a <u>{nuisance} value</u>.

	Positive _____<br />		Positive _____<br />
Line 35:		Line 62:

	<u>more ______</u>		<u>more ______</u>
			a) <br />
			b)

	{{Page \|n°=75}} […]		{{Page \|n°=75}} […]

	{~~{Page \|n°=76}~~} ~~[…]~~		… is Jesus Christus ein <u>Rechtig</u>___ und ein <u>Wahrheit _____</u>, kein Gesellschaft, kein {Sikengott}, kein Kirchen-, ____-, und K________gott! 67

	„Kleanthes” […]		[…] „Jesus ist Sieger!“

			[…]

			{{Page \|n°=76}} […] war theological.

			„Kleanthes” Dialog von 24 B____ eine philosophische-dialektische __________ __ Gottheit…“

			His _____ ___ ____ theological _______ law, theology, etc.

			Hegel […].

	{{Page \|n°=77}} <u>Marx on the „Corporative State”</u>		{{Page \|n°=77}} <u>Marx on the „Corporative State”</u>
Line 55:		Line 94:

	<u>{France}</u>: International exchange ([…])		<u>{France}</u>: International exchange ([…])
			Germany (______)<br />
			England<br />
			Japan<br />
			Italy<br />
			Austria<br />
			<u>Yougoslavia</u> etc. Democracy ______

			{A very […]

	[…]		[…]
Line 60:		Line 107:
	{{Page \|n°=79}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)		{{Page \|n°=79}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)

	Exact nature of crisis […]; unemployment		Exact nature of crisis must be {assertained} working class ____ in its ______, principles, _______ both ___ […]; unemployment

	[…]		[…]
Line 67:		Line 114:
	b) […]		b) […]

	{{Page \|n°=80}} à la Hegel + ~~[…]~~		{{Page \|n°=80}} à la Hegel + a {materialisation} of the Corporations and States of the Realm. But these are certainly, very close analyses.

	It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command.		It is perhaps worthwhile to re-translate Hegel difficult _____ ___ plain English in order to get at the meaning of ___'s command.
Line 74:		Line 121:
	political sphere - economic sphere		political sphere - economic sphere

	1) Hegel refuses to accept the ~~… […]~~		1) Hegel refuses to accept the individual as the wih of the political State.

	He prefers the <u>{facial}</u> and <u>economic life</u> the later as _________ corporations.		He prefers the <u>{facial/fascists}</u> and <u>economic life</u> the later as _________ corporations.

	The State emerges out of the family and economic life […]		The State emerges out of the family and economic life […] of nature out of which the ____ of the State leaps (23)

	{{Page \|n°=82}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)		{{Page \|n°=82}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)

Santiago Pinault at 00:48, 1 September 2019

2019-09-01T00:48:00Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{English to type}}
 [[File:KPA 07-08, 53.jpg|500px|thumb|right]]
-<div style="hand-written">
+<div class="hand-written">
 {{Page |n°=68}} <u>Theory of fascist Transformation</u> (cont)<br />
@@ Line 195: / Line 195: @@
 Very good
-{{Page |n°=106}}
+{{Page |n°=106}} <u>Adams</u> (continued) Epic of thi____ [[1931]]
 {{Page |n°=107}}
-{{Page |n°=108}}
+{{Page |n°=108}} […]
 {{Page |n°=109}} …1935 possibilities as _____ to 1924:
-{{Page |n°=117}} […]
+{{Page |n°=110}} […] Yes, but they {withdrown} this trend with the help of the mother {Comity}; and […]
 Negro slaves : up to 1698 …
-{{Page |n°=131}} Thorstein Veblen: The Theory of the Leisure Class (1899) New York Vanguard Press 1927
+{{Page |n°=118}}
 {{Page |n°=133}} <u>Notes</u> on Fascism
 <u>Organised Capitalism</u> (from the …)
 {{Page |n°=147}} […]

Santiago Pinault at 00:22, 1 September 2019

2019-09-01T00:22:41Z

Show changes