From Felix Schafer (20 October 1957) - Revision history

Santiago Pinault at 22:59, 27 June 2020

2020-06-27T22:59:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 27 June 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:
	{{Page \|n°=35}} Dear Ilona and Karl,		{{Page \|n°=35}} Dear Ilona and Karl,

	Above all our most sincere good wishes … […] language		Above all our most sincere good wishes to your birthday Karl. I must apology for sending … […] and studies Maori language
	</div>		</div>
	{{Page \|n°=36}} and anthropology. She finds affinities between Polynesian, Indo-european and Semitic, as they appear in particular Maori, Sanskrit and Hebrew. Of course the same root may have in these languages different meanings changed by the circumstance of time and place. This is where your book comes in for her. You say e.g. that antiquity had no special concept of economy. Comparison of languages confirms this. For instance OIKOS can be traced in words which show that economy was embedded “in a complexity of non economic institutions". Thus we find the ~~roo~~ OIK in OIKEI- friends, relatives; OIKOPHELES – beneficial for the family, OIKOPHYLAKEO – to guard the home; OIKODOMIA – building, edification, divine knowledge, education. These words express non economic institutions such as family, protection etc. Their relation to OIKOS - economy … […]		{{Page \|n°=36}} and anthropology. She finds affinities between Polynesian, Indo-european and Semitic, as they appear in particular Maori, Sanskrit and Hebrew. Of course the same root may have in these languages different meanings changed by the circumstance of time and place. This is where your book comes in for her. You say e.g. that antiquity had no special concept of economy. Comparison of languages confirms this. For instance OIKOS can be traced in words which show that economy was embedded “in a complexity of non economic institutions". Thus we find the root OIK in OIKEI- friends, relatives; OIKOPHELES – beneficial for the family, OIKOPHYLAKEO – to guard the home; OIKODOMIA – building, edification, divine knowledge, education. These words express non economic institutions such as family, protection etc. Their relation to OIKOS - economy … […]

	<div class="hand-written">Felix Adele</div>		<div class="hand-written">Felix Adele</div>

Santiago Pinault at 22:58, 27 June 2020

2020-06-27T22:58:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:58, 27 June 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=35}} Dear Ilona and Karl,		{{Page \|n°=35}} Dear Ilona and Karl,

			Above all our most sincere good wishes … […] language
	</div>		</div>

	{{Page \|n°=36}} and anthropology. She finds affinities between Polynesian, Indo-european and Semitic, as they appear in particular Maori, Sanskrit and Hebrew. Of course the same root may have in these languages different meanings changed by the circumstance of time and place. This is where your book comes in for her. You say e.g. that antiquity had no special concept of economy. Comparison of languages confirms this. For instance OIKOS can be traced in words which show that economy was embedded “in a complexity of non economic institutions". Thus we find the roo OIK in OIKEI- friends, relatives; OIKOPHELES – beneficial for the family, OIKOPHYLAKEO – to guard the home; OIKODOMIA – building, edification, divine knowledge, education. These words express non economic institutions such as family, protection etc. Their relation to OIKOS - economy … […]		{{Page \|n°=36}} and anthropology. She finds affinities between Polynesian, Indo-european and Semitic, as they appear in particular Maori, Sanskrit and Hebrew. Of course the same root may have in these languages different meanings changed by the circumstance of time and place. This is where your book comes in for her. You say e.g. that antiquity had no special concept of economy. Comparison of languages confirms this. For instance OIKOS can be traced in words which show that economy was embedded “in a complexity of non economic institutions". Thus we find the roo OIK in OIKEI- friends, relatives; OIKOPHELES – beneficial for the family, OIKOPHYLAKEO – to guard the home; OIKODOMIA – building, edification, divine knowledge, education. These words express non economic institutions such as family, protection etc. Their relation to OIKOS - economy … […]

Santiago Pinault at 22:57, 27 June 2020

2020-06-27T22:57:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 27 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{English to type}}		{{English to type}}

			<div class="hand-written">
			{{Page \|n°=35}} Dear Ilona and Karl,
			</div>

			{{Page \|n°=36}} and anthropology. She finds affinities between Polynesian, Indo-european and Semitic, as they appear in particular Maori, Sanskrit and Hebrew. Of course the same root may have in these languages different meanings changed by the circumstance of time and place. This is where your book comes in for her. You say e.g. that antiquity had no special concept of economy. Comparison of languages confirms this. For instance OIKOS can be traced in words which show that economy was embedded “in a complexity of non economic institutions". Thus we find the roo OIK in OIKEI- friends, relatives; OIKOPHELES – beneficial for the family, OIKOPHYLAKEO – to guard the home; OIKODOMIA – building, edification, divine knowledge, education. These words express non economic institutions such as family, protection etc. Their relation to OIKOS - economy … […]

			<div class="hand-written">Felix Adele</div>

			</div>

	== Letter Informations ==		== Letter Informations ==
	'''Reference''':<br />		'''Reference''':<br />
	'''[[Karl Polanyi Archives (KPI Classification)\|KPA]]''': [[58/10]], 34-36		'''[[Karl Polanyi Archives (KPI Classification)\|KPA]]''': [[58/10]], 34-36

Santiago: Created page with "{{English to type}} == Letter Informations == '''Reference''':
'''KPA''': 58/10, 34-36"

2020-02-22T10:37:42Z

Created page with "{{English to type}} == Letter Informations == '''Reference''':<br /> '''KPA''': 58/10, 34-36"

New page

{{English to type}}

== Letter Informations ==
'''Reference''':<br />
'''[[Karl Polanyi Archives (KPI Classification)|KPA]]''': [[58/10]], 34-36

From Felix Schafer (20 October 1957) - Revision history

Santiago Pinault at 22:59, 27 June 2020

Santiago Pinault at 22:58, 27 June 2020

Santiago Pinault at 22:57, 27 June 2020

Santiago: Created page with "{{English to type}} == Letter Informations == '''Reference''': '''KPA''': 58/10, 34-36"

Santiago: Created page with "{{English to type}} == Letter Informations == '''Reference''':
'''KPA''': 58/10, 34-36"