Abraham Rotstein, Weekend Notes XV - Revision history

Santiago Pinault: /* "Freedom and Technology" - General Comments (5) */

2019-12-14T03:08:08Z

"Freedom and Technology" - General Comments (5)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 14 December 2019
Line 136:		Line 136:
	Under the Demchinsky system of growing wheat intensively, it bears 100-fold through sing the spade and has a number of stalks on it. [[#mw-page-base\|↑]]		Under the Demchinsky system of growing wheat intensively, it bears 100-fold through sing the spade and has a number of stalks on it. [[#mw-page-base\|↑]]

	== "Freedom and Technology" - General Comments ~~(5)~~ ==		== "Freedom and Technology" (7) - General Comments ==
	{{Page \|n°=17}} When Emmet Mulvaney read something that we had written he was much taken with it, because these are the basic moral problems and they are not discussed. He thought of it as the basic moral problems of our times such as ethics, not as a topical analysis. He thought these were the general subjects of ethics being brought up. P. thought that this was very encouraging. That the questions of right and wrong and of values are put seems to Emmet to circumscribe the subject. For us freedom stands out, but for him freedom didn’t stand out. P. was struck by this and it is encouraging because it is broader and more permanent than any single subject could be. Underlying that was Emmet’s readiness to take freedom for granted as a subject.		{{Page \|n°=17}} When Emmet Mulvaney read something that we had written he was much taken with it, because these are the basic moral problems and they are not discussed. He thought of it as the basic moral problems of our times such as ethics, not as a topical analysis. He thought these were the general subjects of ethics being brought up. P. thought that this was very encouraging. That the questions of right and wrong and of values are put seems to Emmet to circumscribe the subject. For us freedom stands out, but for him freedom didn’t stand out. P. was struck by this and it is encouraging because it is broader and more permanent than any single subject could be. Underlying that was Emmet’s readiness to take freedom for granted as a subject.

Santiago Pinault: /* Interdisciplinary Project (4) */

2019-12-13T00:38:10Z

Interdisciplinary Project (4)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 13 December 2019
Line 322:		Line 322:

	== Interdisciplinary Project (4) ==		== Interdisciplinary Project (4) ==
	{{Page \|n°=36}} At a recent economic history convention, Carter Goodrich said … […]		{{Page \|n°=36}} At a recent economic history convention, Carter Goodrich said … […] {{English to type}}

	Sylvia Thrupp is … […]		Sylvia Thrupp is … […]
Line 334:		Line 334:
	{{Page \|n°=37}} weight.		{{Page \|n°=37}} weight.

	If P. writes the article for Sylvia Thrupp’s new journal he won’t go out of his way, but will continue on the main line and give that.		If P. writes the article for Sylvia Thrupp’s new journal he won’t go out of his way, but will continue on the main line and give that.

	[[#mw-page-base\|↑]]		[[#mw-page-base\|↑]]

Santiago Pinault: /* "Freedom and Technology" - General Comments (5) */

2019-12-13T00:37:04Z

"Freedom and Technology" - General Comments (5)

Show changes

Santiago Pinault at 18:07, 9 December 2019

2019-12-09T18:07:26Z

Show changes

Santiago Pinault: /* Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2 */

2019-04-25T15:34:42Z

Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2

Show changes

Santiago Pinault at 20:04, 18 April 2019

2019-04-18T20:04:53Z

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 == "Freedom and Technology" - General Comments (5) ==
 [[#mw-page-base|↑]]
@@ Line 81: / Line 105: @@
 == Interdisciplinary Project (4) ==
 [[#mw-page-base|↑]]
@@ Line 92: / Line 120: @@
 === The New Philosophy ===
 [[#mw-page-base|↑]]
@@ Line 101: / Line 131: @@
 === Religion and Capitalism ===
-[[#mw-page-base|↑]]
+{{Page |n°=45}} In Tawney’s “Religion and the Rise of Capitalism” a generalization of Weber’s thesis?
 === Economic Motives ===
@@ Line 116: / Line 152: @@
 === Iron Curtain Literature ===
 [[#mw-page-base|↑]]

Santiago Pinault: /* Trade and Market in the Early Empires (4) */

2019-04-18T19:54:28Z

Trade and Market in the Early Empires (4)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:54, 18 April 2019
Line 71:		Line 71:

	== ''Trade and Market in the Early Empires'' (4) ==		== ''Trade and Market in the Early Empires'' (4) ==
			{{Page \|n°=30}} Schumpeter

			{{Page \|n°=32}}

	[[#mw-page-base\|↑]]		[[#mw-page-base\|↑]]

Santiago Pinault: /* Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2 */

2019-04-18T15:43:53Z

Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2 ==
 {{Page |n°=4}} Preceding this chapter the Introduction would supply it on Owen (myself: and perhaps in the conclusion).
-[…]
+[…] He made a plan part of the administrative Poor Law and he missed the point that there would be no human community. He thought he would mobilize the community without communion.
-This book is supposed to be about freedom. The way this book is written, freedom is a desid-eratum, the absence of which is a criticism of society. Owen himself didn’t think he needs free-dom at all. That is a fact. Under freedom of the individual, that he has the freedom to starve. Owen introduced this term.
+This book is supposed to be about freedom. The way this book is written, freedom is a desideratum, the absence of which is a criticism of society. Owen himself didn’t think he needs freedom at all. That is a fact. Under freedom of the individual, that he has the freedom to starve. Owen introduced this term.
-Owen himself had to introduce the discipline of hunger in [5] the Village of Union – the inden-tured debtor of a worker who can’t leave. We must go into this. We must limit the points that we make.
+Owen himself had to introduce the discipline of hunger in {{Page |n°=5}} the Village of Union – the indentured debtor of a worker who can’t leave. We must go into this. We must limit the points that we make.
 […]
@@ Line 18: / Line 33: @@
 […]
 [[#mw-page-base|↑]]

Santiago Pinault: /* Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2 */

2019-04-18T14:47:48Z

Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 18 April 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:

	== Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2 ==		== Comments on "Robert Owen, Draft #2 ==

			{{Page \|n°=4}} Preceding this chapter the Introduction would supply it on Owen (myself: and perhaps in the conclusion).

			[…]

			This book is supposed to be about freedom. The way this book is written, freedom is a desid-eratum, the absence of which is a criticism of society. Owen himself didn’t think he needs free-dom at all. That is a fact. Under freedom of the individual, that he has the freedom to starve. Owen introduced this term.

			Owen himself had to introduce the discipline of hunger in [5] the Village of Union – the inden-tured debtor of a worker who can’t leave. We must go into this. We must limit the points that we make.

			[…]

			{{Page \|n°=6}} We must be careful about the Builders Guild which was a tremendous movement but failed forever in England. However it continuer in France. All the small contractors said that they could supply the labour and material and make a contract to obtain the capital on a piece-meal basis.
			We should say more about this idea of the old world and new world existing side-by-side. Also, we must find the right place for socialism. We can only do this if there is an overall idea. It doesn’t matter if the chapter become longer.

			[…]

	[[#mw-page-base\|↑]]		[[#mw-page-base\|↑]]

Santiago Pinault: /* Text Informations */

2019-04-17T21:03:59Z

Text Informations

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 17 April 2019
Line 70:		Line 70:

	== Text Informations ==		== Text Informations ==
	'''Date''': September 14, 1957 (Interview)<br />		'''Date''': September 14, [[1957]] (Interview)<br />
	'''KPA''': 45/11		'''KPA''': [[45/11]]