55/02 - Revision history

Santiago Pinault: /* Contents */

2018-04-08T06:35:30Z

Contents

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:35, 8 April 2018
Line 30:		Line 30:
	\| 1-3		\| 1-3
	\|-		\|-
	\| [[From George Dalton to Ilona Duczyńska and Kari Polanyi-Levitt (~~4 April 1964~~)\|From George Dalton to Ilona Duczyńska and Kari Polanyi-Levitt]]		\| [[From George Dalton to Ilona Duczyńska and Kari Polanyi-Levitt (19 May 1965)\|From George Dalton to Ilona Duczyńska and Kari Polanyi-Levitt]]
	\| 1965.05.19		\| 1965.05.19
	\| 8-		\| 8-
	\|}		\|}

Santiago Pinault: /* May 19, 1965 */

2018-04-08T06:33:35Z

May 19, 1965

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 8 April 2018
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\| 8-		\| 8-
	\|}		\|}

	~~=== May 19, 1965 ===~~

	{{Page \|n°=8}} […] Karl asked me to collaborate with him in re-arranging and re-writing T&M. I agreed, but never did because shortly after, the offer to go to Liberia came, and when I returned from Africa in December 1962, …

Santiago Pinault at 06:33, 8 April 2018

2018-04-08T06:33:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 8 April 2018
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Contents ==		== Contents ==

	~~=== 4th April, 1965 ===~~		{\|class="wikitable"
	{{~~Page~~ \|n°=~~1}} […]~~		! From / to
			! Date
	~~Dear George,~~		! Pg
			\|-
	[…] I cannot of course give any immanent criticism, such as Harry or Kari might, since I a not of the profession. So what through my mind in reading your paper is naturally of a personal and at some points of a <u>weltanschaunlich</u> kind, and it will be, I am afraid, quite unsystematic. Anyhow, call it, if you like, “personal knowledge”.		\| [[From Ilona Duczyńska to George Dalton (4 April 1964)\|From Ilona Duczyńska to George Dalton]]
			\| 1964.04.04
	[~~…] A chief may under a big tree redistribute the catch or hunt; or in a modern kolkhoz the proceed comes back~~ to ~~the members in the form of the value of so many labour days. Your formulation seems~~ to ~~fit only something like a theocratic bureaucracy, or the citizen's paying taxes and receiving community services in return, but that is not “an economy”.~~		\| 1-3
			\|-
	[…]		\| [[From George Dalton to Ilona Duczyńska and Kari Polanyi-Levitt (4 April 1964)\|From George Dalton to Ilona Duczyńska and Kari Polanyi-Levitt]]
			\| 1965.05.19
	~~Part III~~. K.~~P. had a regular of policy making or policy {{Page~~ \|~~n°=~~3~~}} suggestions, almost akin to Marx's horror of utopian blueprints. The very …~~		\| 8-
			\|}
	~~In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx~~ and ~~Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (~~Kari ~~is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine~~-~~ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter,~~ and ~~other~~-~~ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed~~. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.

	=== May 19, 1965 ===		=== May 19, 1965 ===

	{{Page \|n°=8}} […] Karl asked me to collaborate with him in re-arranging and re-writing T&M. I agreed, but never did because shortly after, the offer to go to Liberia came, and when I returned from Africa in December 1962, …		{{Page \|n°=8}} […] Karl asked me to collaborate with him in re-arranging and re-writing T&M. I agreed, but never did because shortly after, the offer to go to Liberia came, and when I returned from Africa in December 1962, …

Santiago Pinault: /* 4th April, 1965 */

2018-04-08T06:17:19Z

4th April, 1965

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 == Contents ==
-== 4th April, 1965 ==
+=== 4th April, 1965 ===
 {{Page |n°=1}} […]
 In the introductory part:  in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.

Santiago Pinault: /* KPI Description */

2018-04-08T05:57:05Z

KPI Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 8 April 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== KPI Description ==		== KPI Description ==
			{\|class="wikitable"
			\| Title
			\| Correspondence: Ilona Duczynska – George Dalton, 1964-1970
			\|-
			\| Author
			\| Iiona Duczynska, George Dalton
			\|-
			\| Description
			\| File contains hand-written and typed correspondence between Ilona Duczynska and George Dalton. Some letters are addressed to Ilona Duczynska and Kari Polanyi Levitt. Included in the file is also correspondence with A. Dubuc from Université du Quebec (Canada), Natural History Press, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Francesco Giannini & figli publishers pertaining to the possibility of publishing the monograph Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies. The file also contains copies of letters between professor George Dalton and Hans Zeisel sent to Ilona Duczynska.
			\|-
			\| URI
			\| [http://hdl.handle.net/10694/206 http://hdl.handle.net/10694/206]
			\|-
			\| Date
			\| 1964-1970
			\|}

			== Contents ==

	== 4th April, 1965 ==		== 4th April, 1965 ==

Santiago Pinault: /* Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton */

2017-08-31T13:19:45Z

Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 31 August 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{English to type}}		{{English to type}}

	== ~~Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton~~ ==		== KPI Description ==
	[1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.

			== 4th April, 1965 ==
			{{Page \|n°=1}} […]

			In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.

Santiago Pinault at 16:42, 3 May 2017

2017-05-03T16:42:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 3 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{English to type}}

	== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton ==		== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton ==
	[1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.		[1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.

	~~[[Category: Text in English to type]]~~

Santiago Pinault at 17:51, 27 April 2017

2017-04-27T17:51:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 27 April 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton ==		== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton ==
	[1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.”		[1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.

	[[Category: Text in English to type]]		[[Category: Text in English to type]]

Santiago Pinault: Created page with "== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton == [1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxis..."

2017-04-27T17:51:07Z

Created page with "== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton == [1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxis..."

New page

== Ilona Duczynska to George Dalton ==
[1] In the introductory part: in the list of his loved authors, from whom he learnt, I miss Marx and Maine. Not as if had been a Marxist (Kari is right in her article when she says this bluntly; but he was not a Maine-ist either or a Weber-ist or for that matter, and other-ist. Yet his indebtedness to Marx and to Maine is very great indeed. Personally, I feel that in this list the name of Herskovits is redundant. Karl would have made all acknowledgements where they were due but he did not learn from Herskovits nor think of him with the reverence and love he kept for his heroes of the mind.”

[[Category: Text in English to type]]