32/03 - Revision history

Santiago Pinault: /* Contents */

2019-06-11T21:08:53Z

Contents

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 == Contents ==
-=== Two Meanings of Economy ===
+=== Two Meanings of Economy - Karl Polanyi ===
-{{Page |n°=6}} Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]))
+{{Page |n°=6}} … a Marshall, Pareto and Durkheim equally adhered to it.. Menger alone in his posthumous work criticized the term but neither he nor Max Weber, nor Talcott Parsons {{Page |n°=7}} after him, apprehended the significance of the distinction for sociological analysis.<ref>Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]])) Indeed, there seemed to be no valid reason for distinguished between two root meanings of a term which, as we said, were bound to coincide in practice.

Santiago Pinault: /* Two Meanings of Economy */

2018-04-05T18:38:15Z

Two Meanings of Economy

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 5 April 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:

	=== Two Meanings of Economy ===		=== Two Meanings of Economy ===
	{{Page \|n°=66}} Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault\|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault\|talk]]))		{{Page \|n°=6}} Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault\|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault\|talk]]))

Santiago Pinault at 15:15, 19 December 2017

2017-12-19T15:15:22Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[6-7] Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]))
+== KPI Description ==
-----
+== Contents ==
-'''KPI Description''': Karl Polanyi: Interdisciplinary project 1953-1955: “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” (not for publication), vol. 1 – Columbia University, 1955. File consists of a bound volume of typed memoranda, some of which are annotated, (Memo 20, 19, 16, 11 and 15), titled “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” for the interdisciplinary project 1953-1955. Memorandum 20 (October 1955) was written by Karl Polanyi and is titled "The Two Meanings of Economic". 51p. (See files: 31-16, 32-4, 36-6)

Santiago Pinault at 18:53, 20 April 2017

2017-04-20T18:53:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 20 April 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	----		----
	'''KPI Description''': Karl Polanyi: Interdisciplinary project 1953-1955: “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” (not for publication), vol. 1 – Columbia University, 1955.		'''KPI Description''': Karl Polanyi: Interdisciplinary project 1953-1955: “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” (not for publication), vol. 1 – Columbia University, 1955. File consists of a bound volume of typed memoranda, some of which are annotated, (Memo 20, 19, 16, 11 and 15), titled “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” for the interdisciplinary project 1953-1955. Memorandum 20 (October 1955) was written by Karl Polanyi and is titled "The Two Meanings of Economic". 51p. (See files: 31-16, 32-4, 36-6)
	File consists of a bound volume of typed memoranda, some of which are annotated, (Memo 20, 19, 16, 11 and 15), titled “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” for the interdisciplinary project 1953-1955. Memorandum 20 (October 1955) was written by Karl Polanyi and is titled "The Two Meanings of Economic". 51p. (See files: 31-16, 32-4, 36-6)

Santiago Pinault: Created page with "[6-7] Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail..."

2017-04-20T18:53:03Z

Created page with "[6-7] Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail..."

New page

[6-7] Marshall, Pareto ou Durkheim également adhéraient à [la vision du concept d’économie où sens formel et substantif ne font qu’un]. Seul Menger, dans son travail posthume, critiqua le terme mais ni lui ni Max Weber, pas plus que Talcott Parsons après lui, n’appréhendèrent toute la signification de la distinction pour l’analyse sociologique. (Traduction [[User:Santiago Pinault|Santiago Pinault]] ([[User talk:Santiago Pinault|talk]]))

----
'''KPI Description''': Karl Polanyi: Interdisciplinary project 1953-1955: “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” (not for publication), vol. 1 – Columbia University, 1955.
File consists of a bound volume of typed memoranda, some of which are annotated, (Memo 20, 19, 16, 11 and 15), titled “Selected Memoranda on Economic Aspects of Institutional Growth” for the interdisciplinary project 1953-1955. Memorandum 20 (October 1955) was written by Karl Polanyi and is titled "The Two Meanings of Economic". 51p. (See files: 31-16, 32-4, 36-6)