22/11 - Revision history

Santiago Pinault: /* Contents */

2018-04-05T20:23:27Z

Contents

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 5 April 2018
Line 52:		Line 52:
	It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the Western culture common source was the rise of science, technology and economic organization. Their separate emergences were then		It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the Western culture common source was the rise of science, technology and economic organization. Their separate emergences were then
	{{Page \|n°=7}}		{{Page \|n°=7}}
			</div>

	=== Page d ===		=== Page d ===

Santiago Pinault at 20:21, 5 April 2018

2018-04-05T20:21:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 5 April 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== Contents ==		== Contents ==

	== Page [1957] ==		=== Page [1957] ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=1}} The concept of the economy and underdeveloped areas.		{{Page \|n°=1}} The concept of the economy and underdeveloped areas.
Line 29:		Line 29:
	</div>		</div>

	== Page a ==		=== Page a ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">

Line 39:		Line 39:
	</div>		</div>

	== Page b ==		=== Page b ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=4}} The word economy is there used in two different senses, as Menger was the first to joint out with _____ emphasis. It may ____ fault that the passage ______ not knows to him since it has never yet been translated into English, ______ we will return presently.		{{Page \|n°=4}} The word economy is there used in two different senses, as Menger was the first to joint out with _____ emphasis. It may ____ fault that the passage ______ not knows to him since it has never yet been translated into English, ______ we will return presently.
Line 46:		Line 46:
	</div>		</div>

	== Page c ==		=== Page c ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=6}} The process of rationalization that pervaded Western culture.		{{Page \|n°=6}} The process of rationalization that pervaded Western culture.
Line 54:		Line 54:


	== Page d ==		=== Page d ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=8}} Always a {meshausur} automatically enhanced rational to the pitch of was established which action irrational excess.		{{Page \|n°=8}} Always a {meshausur} automatically enhanced rational to the pitch of was established which action irrational excess.
Line 60:		Line 60:
	The poursuit of knowledge was absolutized …		The poursuit of knowledge was absolutized …
	{{Page \|n°=9}}		{{Page \|n°=9}}


	{{Page \|n°=10}} It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the use of man's reason explains those modern {products} - science, technology and economic organization. It might then indeed be that within a century then emergence was not formations, and that their eventual fusion in the industrial revolution was certainly not … force of man's rationality that was here asserting itself against superstition and irrational custom. That may well be so; it seems both to explain the spectacular success attained by the modern mind in the real world and attribute our ills of the inevitable consequences of those successes themselves: too much science, too much technology, too vast economic organization. This may be fair dialectics, but hardly shows up the way how things happen. Actually our rational drives were allowed {{Page \|n°=12}}<ref>Page 11 is a copy of 10.</ref> to develop into passions governed and stimulated beyond all rational ends by some instituted mechanisms, which alone accounts for the dialectical miracle of reason turning into unreason all along the time. […]		{{Page \|n°=10}} It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the use of man's reason explains those modern {products} - science, technology and economic organization. It might then indeed be that within a century then emergence was not formations, and that their eventual fusion in the industrial revolution was certainly not … force of man's rationality that was here asserting itself against superstition and irrational custom. That may well be so; it seems both to explain the spectacular success attained by the modern mind in the real world and attribute our ills of the inevitable consequences of those successes themselves: too much science, too much technology, too vast economic organization. This may be fair dialectics, but hardly shows up the way how things happen. Actually our rational drives were allowed {{Page \|n°=12}}<ref>Page 11 is a copy of 10.</ref> to develop into passions governed and stimulated beyond all rational ends by some instituted mechanisms, which alone accounts for the dialectical miracle of reason turning into unreason all along the time. […]
Line 68:		Line 67:
	</div>		</div>

	== Page e ==		=== Page e ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=15}}		{{Page \|n°=15}}
Line 74:		Line 73:
	</div>		</div>

	== Page f ==		=== Page f ===
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=16}} {{Page \|n°=17}}		{{Page \|n°=16}} {{Page \|n°=17}}

Santiago Pinault: /* Page d */

2018-03-26T20:30:21Z

Page d

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 26 March 2018
Line 62:		Line 62:


	{{Page \|n°=10}}~~<ref>Page 11 is a copy of 10.</ref>~~ It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the use of man's reason explains those modern {products} - science, technology and economic organization. It might […] {{Page \|n°=11}} {{Page ~~\|n°=12}}~~ to develop into passions governed and stimulated beyond all rational ends by some instituted mechanisms, which alone accounts for the dialectical miracle of reason turning into unreason all along the time.		{{Page \|n°=10}} It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the use of man's reason explains those modern {products} - science, technology and economic organization. It might then indeed be that within a century then emergence was not formations, and that their eventual fusion in the industrial revolution was certainly not … force of man's rationality that was here asserting itself against superstition and irrational custom. That may well be so; it seems both to explain the spectacular success attained by the modern mind in the real world and attribute our ills of the inevitable consequences of those successes themselves: too much science, too much technology, too vast economic organization. This may be fair dialectics, but hardly shows up the way how things happen. Actually our rational drives were allowed {{Page \|n°=12}}<ref>Page 11 is a copy of 10.</ref> to develop into passions governed and stimulated beyond all rational ends by some instituted mechanisms, which alone accounts for the dialectical miracle of reason turning into unreason all along the time. […]

	{{Page \|n°=13}}		{{Page \|n°=13}} Max
	{{Page \|n°=14}}		{{Page \|n°=14}}
	</div>		</div>

Santiago Pinault: /* Page d */

2018-03-26T19:01:50Z

Page d

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 26 March 2018
Line 56:		Line 56:
	== Page d ==		== Page d ==
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=8}} Always		{{Page \|n°=8}} Always a {meshausur} automatically enhanced rational to the pitch of was established which action irrational excess.

			The poursuit of knowledge was absolutized …
	{{Page \|n°=9}}		{{Page \|n°=9}}

Santiago Pinault: /* Page y */

2018-03-26T18:42:33Z

Page y

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 </div>
-== Page y ==
+== Page c ==
 <div class="hand-written">
 {{Page |n°=6}} The process of rationalization that pervaded Western culture.
 It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the Western culture common source was the rise of science, technology and economic organization. Their separate emergences were then
 </div>
 === Harry Pearson fragments of texts ===
-{{Page |n°=18}} => {{Page |n°=25}}
+{{Page |n°=18}} The conventional view of ecy-polity:
 === Other fragment ===

Santiago Pinault: /* Contents */

2018-03-26T18:26:41Z

Contents

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 26 March 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:

	== Contents ==		== Contents ==

			== Page [1957] ==
			<div class="hand-written">
			{{Page \|n°=1}} The concept of the economy and underdeveloped areas.

			ad §: The doctrinal groundings argument of the underdeveloped (unenturked) areas that possess no mandat systematization. Since 1957 a conceptual system was developed by Karl Polanyi and associated at Columbia University. It starts from the two meanings of economic and leads up to a minimum definition of the economy which claims to be applicable to all the social sciences that touch upon the economy and its place in society. Comprehensive theoretical and empirical efforts were made to establish the mean substantive and institutional approach in the sub-disciplines of anthropology, sociology, economic and history. Important contributions were made by Harry W. Pearson and Walter C. Neale, economics; Terrence K. Hopkins, sociology; Paul Bohannan and C. W. Arensberg, anthropology and A. L. Opphenheim and R. F. G. Sweet, assyriology.

			A detailed bibliography is provided.
			</div>

			== Page a ==
	<div class="hand-written">		<div class="hand-written">
	~~{{Page \|n°=1}} The concept of the economy and underdeveloped areas. […]~~

	{{Page \|n°=2}} The discovery: <u>atomistic individualism</u> - the situation of man with <u>Owen</u> it was the discovery of society […] Rousseau […]		{{Page \|n°=2}} The discovery: <u>atomistic individualism</u> - the situation of man with <u>Owen</u> it was the discovery of society […] Rousseau […]
Line 27:		Line 37:

	<u>Adam Smith</u> : […]		<u>Adam Smith</u> : […]
			</div>

			== Page b ==
			<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=4}} The word economy is there used in two different senses, as Menger was the first to joint out with _____ emphasis. It may ____ fault that the passage ______ not knows to him since it has never yet been translated into English, ______ we will return presently.		{{Page \|n°=4}} The word economy is there used in two different senses, as Menger was the first to joint out with _____ emphasis. It may ____ fault that the passage ______ not knows to him since it has never yet been translated into English, ______ we will return presently.

	On the other hand it might be that ___ _______ was copying ____ Menger's “two aspects of the economy, which indeed have “everything in common” since it is one and the same economy which can be looked upon once, once as an aggregate of objects, once as a group of persons dealing with those objects.[…] sphere of material livelihood whether or not …		On the other hand it might be that ___ _______ was copying ____ Menger's “two aspects of the economy, which indeed have “everything in common” since it is one and the same economy which can be looked upon once, once as an aggregate of objects, once as a group of persons dealing with those objects.[…] sphere of material livelihood whether or not …
			</div>

			== Page y ==
			<div class="hand-written">
	{{Page \|n°=6}} The process of rationalization that pervaded Western culture.		{{Page \|n°=6}} The process of rationalization that pervaded Western culture.

Santiago Pinault: /* Other fragment */

2018-03-26T15:48:10Z

Other fragment

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 26 March 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:
	=== Other fragment ===		=== Other fragment ===
	{{Page \|n°=25}} => {{Page \|n°=28}}		{{Page \|n°=25}} => {{Page \|n°=28}}

			== Editor's Notes ==

			<references />

Santiago Pinault at 13:03, 20 December 2017

2017-12-20T13:03:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 20 December 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Question}}

	{\|class="wikitable"		{\|class="wikitable"
	\| Title		\| Title

Santiago Pinault: /* Contents */

2017-12-20T12:57:03Z

Contents

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 20 December 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	== Contents ==		== Contents ==
			<div class="hand-written">
			{{Page \|n°=1}} The concept of the economy and underdeveloped areas. […]

			{{Page \|n°=2}} The discovery: <u>atomistic individualism</u> - the situation of man with <u>Owen</u> it was the discovery of society […] Rousseau […]

			Hobbes: a control social should be …

			<u>Adam Smith</u> : […]

			{{Page \|n°=4}} The word economy is there used in two different senses, as Menger was the first to joint out with _____ emphasis. It may ____ fault that the passage ______ not knows to him since it has never yet been translated into English, ______ we will return presently.

			On the other hand it might be that ___ _______ was copying ____ Menger's “two aspects of the economy, which indeed have “everything in common” since it is one and the same economy which can be looked upon once, once as an aggregate of objects, once as a group of persons dealing with those objects.[…] sphere of material livelihood whether or not …


			{{Page \|n°=6}} The process of rationalization that pervaded Western culture.

			It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the Western culture common source was the rise of science, technology and economic organization. Their separate emergences were then

			{{Page \|n°=10}}<ref>Page 11 is a copy of 10.</ref> It has been said - Max Weber devoted his genius to this thesis - that the use of man's reason explains those modern {products} - science, technology and economic organization. It might […] {{Page \|n°=12}} to develop into passions governed and stimulated beyond all rational ends by some instituted mechanisms, which alone accounts for the dialectical miracle of reason turning into unreason all along the time.
			</div>

			=== Harry Pearson fragments of texts ===
			{{Page \|n°=18}} => {{Page \|n°=25}}

			=== Other fragment ===
			{{Page \|n°=25}} => {{Page \|n°=28}}

Santiago Pinault: Created page with "{|class="wikitable" | Title | Fragments of texts – Economy and society |- | Author | Polanyi, Karl |- | Description | File contains Karl Polanyi’s hand-written and typed..."

2017-12-20T12:29:46Z

Created page with "{|class="wikitable" | Title | Fragments of texts – Economy and society |- | Author | Polanyi, Karl |- | Description | File contains Karl Polanyi’s hand-written and typed..."

New page

{|class="wikitable"
| Title
| Fragments of texts – Economy and society
|-
| Author
| Polanyi, Karl
|-
| Description
| File contains Karl Polanyi’s hand-written and typed fragments of texts on economy and society, and economy in underdeveloped areas. Also included in the file are notes by Harry Pearson sent to Karl Polanyi. The notes are in English.
|-
| URI
| [http://hdl.handle.net/10694/791 http://hdl.handle.net/10694/791]
|-
| Date
| 2010-09-10
|}

== Contents ==